What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Post by **Dave** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:11 am

Overly erogenous feet

http://wapsisquare.com/comic/what-did-you-say-2/

DilyV · Post by **DilyV** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:13 am

No foot job jokes!!!! LOL

FreeFlier · Post by **FreeFlier** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:24 am

Was it the message . . . or the messenger?

Obviously Nadette touches Atsali's sole . . .

/adds a set of gel insoles to the pun jar and flrrd/

--FreeFlier

jeffepp · Post by **jeffepp** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:30 am

"There are toe, er two kinds of people in the world. Those who like foot massages..."

"Mmph! That IS a tasty..."

Post by **Dave** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:52 am

I don't think Atsali finished quite all of her homework reading. If she'd read the chapter on Marshall McLuhan, she wouldn't have been so surprised. She would have remembered that Nadette is a Seer, and realized that the medium is the massage.

(Places an inventory of effects into the Pun Jar)

Naemless · Post by **Naemless** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:17 am

Well, if Nadette wasn't quite paying attention, she may have said 'foot long massage.'

Opus the Poet · Post by **Opus the Poet** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:48 am

Naemless wrote:Well, if Nadette wasn't quite paying attention, she may have said 'foot long massage.'

The Pun Vault will feast tonight!

lake_wrangler · Post by **lake_wrangler** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:02 am

Did Nadette just say that Atsali has big feet?

FreeFlier · Post by **FreeFlier** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:15 am

lake_wrangler wrote:Did Nadette just say that Atsali has big feet?

It is The Way of the Sasquatch.

--FreeFlier

lake_wrangler · Post by **lake_wrangler** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:19 am

FreeFlier wrote:
lake_wrangler wrote:Did Nadette just say that Atsali has big feet?
It is The Way of the Sasquatch.

--FreeFlier

I don't know about you, but I was taught never to sass my elders... much less a quatch...

*Drops a copy of the film footage (no pun intended) of bigfoot into the pun jar*

Sgt. Howard · Post by **Sgt. Howard** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:11 pm

lake_wrangler wrote:
FreeFlier wrote:
lake_wrangler wrote:Did Nadette just say that Atsali has big feet?
It is The Way of the Sasquatch.

--FreeFlier
I don't know about you, but I was taught never to sass my elders... much less a quatch...

*Drops a copy of the film footage (no pun intended) of bigfoot into the pun jar*

Hmm... she now sprouts the wings of a Succubus... or maybe... an Incubus? And could there be other anatomical modifications involved? Of a twelve inch variety?

... just wondering...

Opus the Poet · Post by **Opus the Poet** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:41 pm

After a night's reflection, is it possible that for a siren or succubus the foot is a natural erogenous zone while such obvious things as breasts are not. After all if a siren is a predator that uses big melons to lure in prey it seems pretty obvious that getting turned on by getting them played with would be counter productive to using them to procure sustenance. So moving the erogenous zone to another body part seems highly likely.

DilyV · Post by **DilyV** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:08 pm

FreeFlier wrote:Was it the message . . . or the messenger?

Obviously Nadette touches Atsali's sole . . .

/adds a set of gel insoles to the pun jar and flrrd/

--FreeFlier

I guess you could say that Nadette and Atsali are Sole mates...

GlytchMeister · Post by **GlytchMeister** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:10 pm

DilyV wrote:
FreeFlier wrote:Was it the message . . . or the messenger?

Obviously Nadette touches Atsali's sole . . .

/adds a set of gel insoles to the pun jar and flrrd/

--FreeFlier
I guess you could say that Nadette and Atsali are Sole mates...

GROAN

Pun Jar. Now please. Owwie.

AnotherFairportfan · Post by **AnotherFairportfan** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:11 pm

Opus the Poet wrote:After a night's reflection, is it possible that for a siren or succubus the foot is a natural erogenous zone while such obvious things as breasts are not. After all if a siren is a predator that uses big melons to lure in prey it seems pretty obvious that getting turned on by getting them played with would be counter productive to using them to procure sustenance. So moving the erogenous zone to another body part seems highly likely.

Over at Dangerously Chloe, a succubus' horns are {very sensitive} erogenous zones.

meisdadoo · Post by **meisdadoo** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:29 pm

Most of the puns aside,
It was the messenger, not the message.
I suspect that the incubus side going through puberty may be like a normal male mortal, where a sunny day can cause a "wing boner"
Having the girl you like whispering anything in your ear would likely cause not only a massive wing boner, but also a premature need for a visit to the restroom to cleanup--just sayin

Which brings up an entirely different question (which someone may have answered before and I missed it) If Atsali's feathery wing boner is from her mom's side of the family, and bat wings with tail are from her dad's side of the family, does she have two sets of genitalia? That would certainly explain why she just naturally likes girls and boys--and no one seems to care or even notice (except her new girlfriend, because, well, reasons)

I'm just gonna go sit in the confusion corner and watch from a distance. . .

Post by **Dave** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 4:51 pm

GlytchMeister wrote:
DilyV wrote:I guess you could say that Nadette and Atsali are Sole mates...
GROAN

Pun Jar. Now please. Owwie.

Well, I could suggest that an erotic foot-rub involving two young ladies who are girlfriends, could end up in a "fille-lay of sole" situation, but that would probably hurt even more, so I really shouldn't, should I?

(Places a copy of "How To Win Friends And Influence People" into the Pun Jar... the French translation, of course.)

Gyrrakavian · Post by **Gyrrakavian** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:34 pm

Hmmm... Pablo might want to vet some of the comics getting ad space. There's one with a gif of a character jambing a fork in a power outlet and getting shocked.

Gyrrakavian · Post by **Gyrrakavian** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:48 pm

meisdadoo wrote:Most of the puns aside,
It was the messenger, not the message.
I suspect that the incubus side going through puberty may be like a normal male mortal, where a sunny day can cause a "wing boner"
Having the girl you like whispering anything in your ear would likely cause not only a massive wing boner, but also a premature need for a visit to the restroom to cleanup--just sayin

Which brings up an entirely different question (which someone may have answered before and I missed it) If Atsali's feathery wing boner is from her mom's side of the family, and bat wings with tail are from her dad's side of the family, does she have two sets of genitalia? That would certainly explain why she just naturally likes girls and boys--and no one seems to care or even notice (except her new girlfriend, because, well, reasons)

I'm just gonna go sit in the confusion corner and watch from a distance. . .

Incubus and sucubus are two different names for the two different sexes of the same type of paranormal (they aren't demons in the Wapsiverse). We've got WoG that Sali is 100% female and not intersex. Though there is some debate as to whether she just has two sets of wings or if the wing type depends on which side of her heritage is being more dominant.

TL;DR = she's not a futa

Typeminer · Post by **Typeminer** » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:57 pm

Dave wrote:
DilyV wrote:I guess you could say that Nadette and Atsali are Sole mates...
Well, I could suggest that an erotic foot-rub involving two young ladies who are girlfriends, could end up in a "fille-lay of sole" situation, but that would probably hurt even more, so I really shouldn't, should I?

I could be reading about terrorist suicide atrocities right now. Masochistic tendencies must be stronger than I thought.

Wapsi Square Forum

What Did You Say 2016-03-23

What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23

Re: What Did You Say 2016-03-23