Your Punishment 2016-04-18
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:22 pm
A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
http://forum.wapsisquare.com/
Aye, the former bookworm has definitely turned.DilyV wrote:Having to explain it to the tumbleweed is worse than explaining it to Kath... who is looking awfully good these days compared to her origins in the strip...
Unfortunately that is a possibility . . . we had one like that in my school more than thirty years ago, and the courts wouldn't let the district get rid of her because it might violate her rights.jeffepp wrote:Just a thought: what's the chance that the coach was interested in other skills, not related to sports? That she really wanted our girl on her team, and in her locker room. If you are going to break that many rules, is it really for a win at a third tier high school sport? Some how, things aren't adding up in my mind.
I'm not saying that Atsali would have been cognizant of the nature of the attention, or intentionally encouraging it. For her, the nice lady was giving her things, because she was good. The idea that she might need to be "extra good" off the field later, to keep the toys coming, would not have accured to her.
Just a few thoughts.
AND piles on the guilt... trying to explain to a minor why she did something she should not do...Dave wrote:The classic method for learning something well:
I guess it's likely to work pretty well for learning well what not to do, also! For Atsali to have to explain to Pickle how and why she messed up, she'll need to explain it clearly and convincingly to herself, first.
- Watch one.
- Do one.
- Teach one.
How did Kath get so wise?
(Excellent choice of avatar, AFF! I guess we can start referring to Paul as The Great Badger, right?)
well I guess it depends whether the other players would get badly wounded!!! Thats why the first year does not mix with the fifth year!FreeFlier wrote:Ow! Ow ow ow!
"Maybe the secret is to not do things that would disappoint six-year-olds?"
Unfortunately that is a possibility . . . we had one like that in my school more than thirty years ago, and the courts wouldn't let the district get rid of her because it might violate her rights.jeffepp wrote:Just a thought: what's the chance that the coach was interested in other skills, not related to sports? That she really wanted our girl on her team, and in her locker room. If you are going to break that many rules, is it really for a win at a third tier high school sport? Some how, things aren't adding up in my mind.
I'm not saying that Atsali would have been cognizant of the nature of the attention, or intentionally encouraging it. For her, the nice lady was giving her things, because she was good. The idea that she might need to be "extra good" off the field later, to keep the toys coming, would not have accured to her.
Just a few thoughts.
Apparently the rights of the girls didn't matter.
--FreeFlier
jeffepp wrote:Just a thought: what's the chance that the coach was interested in other skills, not related to sports? That she really wanted our girl on her team, and in her locker room. If you are going to break that many rules, is it really for a win at a third tier high school sport? Some how, things aren't adding up in my mind.
I'm not saying that Atsali would have been cognizant of the nature of the attention, or intentionally encouraging it. For her, the nice lady was giving her things, because she was good. The idea that she might need to be "extra good" off the field later, to keep the toys coming, would not have accured to her.
Just a few thoughts.
You may be on to something. Could be that the team has been suffering from a distinct lack of cohesion and the coach, knowing how selfless Sali is from Jessie's wardrobe malfunction in the pool, hoped that selflessness would rub off.jeffepp wrote:Just a thought: what's the chance that the coach was interested in other skills, not related to sports? That she really wanted our girl on her team, and in her locker room. If you are going to break that many rules, is it really for a win at a third tier high school sport? Some how, things aren't adding up in my mind.
I'm not saying that Atsali would have been cognizant of the nature of the attention, or intentionally encouraging it. For her, the nice lady was giving her things, because she was good. The idea that she might need to be "extra good" off the field later, to keep the toys coming, would not have accured to her.
Just a few thoughts.
If you're implying what i think you're implying, i certainly hope that that's not the case.jeffepp wrote:Just a thought: what's the chance that the coach was interested in other skills, not related to sports? That she really wanted our girl on her team, and in her locker room. If you are going to break that many rules, is it really for a win at a third tier high school sport? Some how, things aren't adding up in my mind.
I'm not saying that Atsali would have been cognizant of the nature of the attention, or intentionally encouraging it. For her, the nice lady was giving her things, because she was good. The idea that she might need to be "extra good" off the field later, to keep the toys coming, would not have accured to her.
Just a few thoughts.
Especially because it's not the coach who takes the hard hits, broken bones, torn ligaments and concussions that the team members risk, essentially for free - and he needs to protect his multi-million yearly contract.Gyrrakavian wrote:Some coaches (and people in general) can get pretty obsessed with winning,regardless of the sport.
It's POSSIBLE. Especially given that Atsali is part Siren and therefore, according to stereotype, racially inclined to promiscuity. Add in the incubus part and some people may have fantasies they can't resist.jeffepp wrote:Just a thought: what's the chance that the coach was interested in other skills, not related to sports? That she really wanted our girl on her team, and in her locker room. If you are going to break that many rules, is it really for a win at a third tier high school sport? Some how, things aren't adding up in my mind.
I'm not saying that Atsali would have been cognizant of the nature of the attention, or intentionally encouraging it. For her, the nice lady was giving her things, because she was good. The idea that she might need to be "extra good" off the field later, to keep the toys coming, would not have accured to her.
Just a few thoughts.