Page 3 of 4
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:48 pm
by Dave
Catawampus wrote:Though I'd imagine that taking on another individual's form might be considered something of a social faux pas (or bear pas, in the case of ursamorphs).
//SPLORF//
You definitely owe the Pun Jar something for that one... nicely done!
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:14 pm
by My2Cents
Dave wrote:
So, Bia is definitely a shapeshifter, but we don't know if she can (or does) shapeshift into any non-humanoid form. Since she's a full Titan, her shapeshifting ability may well be inborn, but I don't think we even know that for certain.
Looking back at the Greek legends, the titans were pretty much unlimited shape changers. Zeus in particular seems to have favored non-humanoid shapes (Goose, bull, sun beam, satyr, etc.) for his seductions/rapes.
That could mean that Shelley has more than just her human and sphinx, just that she has probably never thought to try.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:30 pm
by Catawampus
Dave wrote:Catawampus wrote:Though I'd imagine that taking on another individual's form might be considered something of a social faux pas (or bear pas, in the case of ursamorphs).
//SPLORF//
You definitely owe the Pun Jar something for that one... nicely done!
Do you suppose that it would accept almond pastries?
My2Cents wrote:Looking back at the Greek legends, the titans were pretty much unlimited shape changers.
Proteus literally gave his name to the ability.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:55 pm
by Fairportfan
Wyvern wrote:Clearly "dorky" is not the first word to come to Atsali's mind. If she's got self control she won't say the first word that comes to mind, nor the several that follow.
I doubt that Atsali is all that familiar with The Dukes of Hazzard ... but that was what sprung to my mind when i hit that panel.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:58 pm
by Dr. Otter
meisdadoo wrote:Triplets from different families? -- you must mean "identical cousins"

"Cathy adores the minuet, the Ballet Russe, and crepe suzette..."
Dating myself pretty badly, huh?
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:05 pm
by Fairportfan
zachariah wrote: ... the Golem Girls. Surpising it appears Teopez does not have that power.
The GGGs can shift to animal avatars*; i don't recall them shifting to anything else (though they can apparently morph their clothing, unless the "bunny girls" strip is No Longer An Operative Statement). Tepoz was made from either a rat or a weasel, i forget which, which is not a form i would think he'd be interested in publicly taking ... unless he was hoping to get away from Monica when she was In A Mood with him.
================
* I originally said "an animal avatar", but then i thought of Jin apparently showing up to Shelly as a rabbit.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:09 pm
by Fairportfan
My2Cents wrote:Dave wrote:Looking back at the Greek legends, the titans were pretty much unlimited shape changers. Zeus in particular seems to have favored non-humanoid shapes (Goose, bull, sun beam, satyr, etc.) for his seductions/rapes.
I believe that Zeus and his gang weren't actually Titans - he was the son of a Titan, and one thing for sure about Greek mythological genetics, the species of neither the mother or the father seems to have been definitive in determining what came out.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:08 am
by Mark N
Dr. Otter wrote:meisdadoo wrote:Triplets from different families? -- you must mean "identical cousins"

"Cathy adores the minuet, the Ballet Russe, and crepe suzette..."
Dating myself pretty badly, huh?
Park your walker next to mine then Gramps.

Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:10 am
by Mark N
zachariah wrote: ... the Golem Girls. Surpising it appears Teopez does not have that power.
Well Tepoz is a prototype so he may not have all of the features the girls do.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:11 am
by loxmyth
Y'know, I'm wondering if this is the same impulse which causes some folks to unthinkingly pick up the accents around them as a way of blending in... which I've sometimes caught myself doing, and then had to explain that it wasn't intended as a comment.
On the other hand, they've also solved the "which twin am I talking to" problem... though only partly since they could trade appearances at the drop of a nonexistent hat if they wanted to.
"Freckles. Why did it have to be freckles..."
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:27 am
by Fairportfan
loxmyth wrote:On the other hand, they've also solved the "which twin am I talking to" problem... though only partly since they could trade appearances at the drop of a nonexistent hat if they wanted to.
You could before (once they identified themselves). Note the shoulders:

- twins.jpg (38.7 KiB) Viewed 8425 times
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:28 am
by Fairportfan
Just hit me - they must interact on some twins-only level; there was no discussion (that we heard) of what they were going to morph to.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:02 am
by GlytchMeister
That's surprisingly common. Besides the stories of twins having weird telepathic links and such, twins often develop their own language when they are extremely young, and can sometimes preserve that unique language for decades. It wouldn't be much of a stretch for twins to have a unique nonverbal communication (body language, etc). That would explain how they could coordinate the "party tricks" ... Trick... So quickly. The way it was presented, it seemed as though one morphed into the balloon animal before the other said the words "party tricks".
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:09 am
by Fairportfan
GlytchMeister wrote:That's surprisingly common. Besides the stories of twins having weird telepathic links and such, twins often develop their own language when they are extremely young, and can sometimes preserve that unique language for decades. It wouldn't be much of a stretch for twins to have a unique nonverbal communication (body language, etc). That would explain how they could coordinate the "party tricks" ... Trick... So quickly. The way it was presented, it seemed as though one morphed into the balloon animal before the other said the words "party tricks".
They both say "party tricks", i think.
Yep. The balloon animal is saying it too.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:13 am
by GlytchMeister
Still, I would guess that took some amount of either mutual understanding or nonverbal communication.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:32 am
by Fairportfan
GlytchMeister wrote:Still, I would guess that took some amount of either mutual understanding or nonverbal communication.
They've probably done it before.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:03 am
by Mark N
Fairportfan wrote:GlytchMeister wrote:Still, I would guess that took some amount of either mutual understanding or nonverbal communication.
They've probably done it before.
They are probably telepathic (at least to each other) and might even have a hive mind ability (We are talking about creatures of legend here so all bets are on the table regardless of (our) known scientific norms).

Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:46 pm
by GlytchMeister
Mark N wrote:Fairportfan wrote:GlytchMeister wrote:Still, I would guess that took some amount of either mutual understanding or nonverbal communication.
They've probably done it before.
They are probably telepathic (at least to each other) and might even have a hive mind ability (We are talking about creatures of legend here so all bets are on the table regardless of (our) known scientific norms).

Indeed, but the simplest answer is often the correct one. Or, in this case, the answer most firmly rooted in reality.

Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:12 pm
by Fairportfan
Note that they say they've used these forms before.
Re: Too Dorky 2013-12-10
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:24 pm
by GuySmiley
GlytchMeister wrote:
Indeed, but the simplest answer is often the correct one. Or, in this case, the answer most firmly rooted in reality.

Reali-what?!? Never heard of it.
