Target: Mars?

All off topic conversation held here. Have fun and play nice. =)

Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7586
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Target: Mars?

Post by Dave »

Current orbital elements seem to indicate that Comet C/2013 A1 will make a very close approach to Mars in October of next year... closer than the Earth/Moon distance! It seems to be within the realm of possibility that the comet might even hit Mars - the orbit is not well enough determined to rule this out yet, and comet orbits can change due to outgassing pressure as they get closer to the Sun.

http://spaceobs.org/en/2013/02/25/comet ... with-mars/

This one should be worth watching!
User avatar
MerchManDan
Posts: 1674
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:40 am
Location: Somewhere else.
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by MerchManDan »

Leonid Elinin wrote:On the 19th October 2014, the comet might reach apparent magnitude of -8…-8.5, as seen from Mars! Perhaps it will be possible to accuire high-resolution images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO).
NEAT!! :geek: So even if there's no impact, there might still be some cool "close-up" photos of an actual comet. I wonder if the Mars Rover will be able to see it from the surface.
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." - Nim the chimp
Image
Animation courtesy of shadowinthelight (thanks again!)
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7586
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by Dave »

MerchManDan wrote:NEAT!! :geek: So even if there's no impact, there might still be some cool "close-up" photos of an actual comet. I wonder if the Mars Rover will be able to see it from the surface.
I would bet that it will. A visual magnitude of -8 to -8.5 as seen from Mars is really bright!

You can see objects of -4 or brighter during the day, even with the Sun high in the sky. Venus reaches nearly -5 at its brightest. The International Space Station going right overhead ranges from around -4 to almost -6 (it'll be around -4 when it passes over my area in about 20 minutes... I'm going to wander outside and take a look). The brightest supernova ever recorded (in 1066) was estimated at about -7.5, and was said to be "a little more than a quarter that of Moon light."

So, yeah, presuming that Curiosity and/or the Mars Orbiter are still operating then, they should have an incredible ring-side seat to this one.

And, of course, if the "small probability" event occurs, and the comet actually hits Mars... well, I imagine we'll see the flash from here quite easily. "500 km crater". Brrrr...
Last edited by Dave on Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MerchManDan
Posts: 1674
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:40 am
Location: Somewhere else.
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by MerchManDan »

Dave wrote:And, of course, if the "small probability" event occurs, and the comet actually hits Mars... well, I imagine we'll see the flash from here quite easily. "500 mile crater". Brrrr...
Wow, right. That kind of impact will kick up an obscene amount of ejecta, too - probably a good chance of Mars going dark for a very long time.
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." - Nim the chimp
Image
Animation courtesy of shadowinthelight (thanks again!)
User avatar
jwhouk
Posts: 6053
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 7:58 am
Location: The Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by jwhouk »

That might put that plan of sending a married couple on a swing around Mars to be a bad idea...
"Character is what you are in the dark." - D.L. Moody
"You should never run from the voices in your head. That's how you give them power." - Jin
User avatar
Julie
Posts: 1607
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by Julie »

jwhouk wrote:That might put that plan of sending a married couple on a swing around Mars to be a bad idea...
Hahaha! I saw that on the news this morning. :D It would certainly make the trip more interesting.

"Look honey...there's the giant hole where the comet hit!" :P
"Just open your eyes
And see that life is beautiful."
User avatar
Atomic
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:39 am
Location: Central PA
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by Atomic »

Hmmm -- The Hiroshima bomb yield was about 15 kilotons and directly destroyed a mile diameter circle, damaging another mile distant from blast wave and fires.

The Russian meteor detonated at an altitude of about 32 miles with an estimated force of 250 KT (one quarter Megaton), and broke/blew out windows under it's path.

The biggest exploded nuclear device, Tsar Bomba, yielded 57 MT, and knocked people off their feet 300 miles away!

And, if this source is correct, a comet collision with Mars would be in the range of 5-20,000 MT, causing a 300 mile wide crater!! From that, the shock to the Martian crust would cause a planetary quake, no doubt lasting a long time as it circled the planet several times, not only from the impact, but from the rebound as well.

Allowing that the Mars rovers aren't hit directly, their last observations may very well be them being tossed into the air from the ground shock, before burial by weeks, if not months, of falling debris.
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!

My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
User avatar
scantrontb
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:44 am

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by scantrontb »

Atomic wrote:And, if this source is correct, a comet collision with Mars would be in the range of 5-20,000 MT, causing a 300 mile wide crater!!
you got your numbers wrong... they quoted five to twenty BILLION MegaTons... not five to twenty THOUSAND... just a slight million times too small!
Don't planto mihi adveho illac
User avatar
shadowinthelight
Posts: 2571
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:49 pm
Location: Somewhere, TX
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by shadowinthelight »

I'd gladly go on that couple's trip to Mars, but I need a wife first. :(
Julie, about Wapsi Square wrote:Oh goodness yes. So much paranormal!

Image My deviantART and YouTube.
I'm done thinking for today! It's caused me enough trouble!
User avatar
Atomic
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:39 am
Location: Central PA
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by Atomic »

"A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon, you're talking real money." - Everett Dirksen

Same goes with explosions, sort of!
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!

My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
User avatar
bmonk
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:19 pm

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by bmonk »

Atomic wrote:"A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon, you're talking real money." - Everett Dirksen

Same goes with explosions, sort of!
Black hat guy: "What if we tried more power?"
User avatar
shadowinthelight
Posts: 2571
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:49 pm
Location: Somewhere, TX
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by shadowinthelight »

Tim Allen would have loved that.
Julie, about Wapsi Square wrote:Oh goodness yes. So much paranormal!

Image My deviantART and YouTube.
I'm done thinking for today! It's caused me enough trouble!
User avatar
DinkyInky
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:38 am
Location: Where there's more than Corn.
Contact:

Re: Target: Mars?

Post by DinkyInky »

Professor Foot: Voltage, VOLTAGE! Up up. Up up
Yanno how some people have Angels/Devils for a conscience? I have a Dark Elf ShadowKnight and a Half Elf Ranger for mine. The really bad part is when they agree on something.

Aphyon chu kissa whol l'jaed.
--Safyr Drathmir
Post Reply