What do you see?
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:36 pm
Wapsi Square Forum
A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
https://forum.wapsisquare.com/
What do you see?
Page 1 of 1
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:39 pm
It really should be a stereo-gram.
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:18 am
I see a butt!
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:34 am
What, exactly, is the point of that?
(Not you, Fairportfan, but whoever came up with the idea to do that in the first place...)
(Not you, Fairportfan, but whoever came up with the idea to do that in the first place...)
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:36 am
The outline of the model is obvious, but it is a rather remarkable airbrush/body paint combo.
I rather like the Pink Floyd album covers by the poolpic.
Some people don't see these kinds of things as art, and that is their loss.
I rather like the Pink Floyd album covers by the poolpic.
Some people don't see these kinds of things as art, and that is their loss.
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:43 am
Oh, of course it is art. And much talent obviously went into making it. I am not denying that.DinkyInky wrote:The outline of the model is obvious, but it is a rather remarkable airbrush/body paint combo.
I rather like the Pink Floyd album covers by the poolpic.
Some people don't see these kinds of things as art, and that is their loss.
It also pushes, in my opinion, the borders of decency... Art for the sake of art can only go so far...
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:54 am
Why is it here that decency(nudity and such) is a push-button topic? I don't want to derail this thread, so here you go.lake_wrangler wrote:Oh, of course it is art. And much talent obviously went into making it. I am not denying that.
It also pushes, in my opinion, the borders of decency... Art for the sake of art can only go so far...
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:56 am
I don't think it's in the least bit indecent. Heck...paintings and sculptures of nudity have long been considered fine art and not indecent (excepting the addition of fig leaves to some statues during a period of time waaaay back). Why is painting a nude body like this any more indecent? You actually end up seeing less of the "nudity" and more of the art this way.lake_wrangler wrote:Oh, of course it is art. And much talent obviously went into making it. I am not denying that.
It also pushes, in my opinion, the borders of decency... Art for the sake of art can only go so far...
Re: What do you see?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:05 pm
And Justice's boobs during the W Administration...Julie wrote:I don't think it's in the least bit indecent. Heck...paintings and sculptures of nudity have long been considered fine art and not indecent (excepting the addition of fig leaves to some statues during a period of time waaaay back). Why is painting a nude body like this any more indecent? You actually end up seeing less of the "nudity" and more of the art this way.lake_wrangler wrote:Oh, of course it is art. And much talent obviously went into making it. I am not denying that.
It also pushes, in my opinion, the borders of decency... Art for the sake of art can only go so far...