Mistress And Commander: Captain Shelly Wahnee
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:15 am
A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
https://forum.wapsisquare.com/
THAT looks like an artillery saber- a naval commander would carry a cutlass. I know that sounds a bit nit-picky, but seriously- a full sized saber requires a lot of room to use and ships do not offer that. Any enemy she would face would be armed with cutlasses- a saber would be at a disadvantage because they cannot move as fast and can hang up on too many things. In open terrain, the saber would be the better choice because of it's reach. Remember, the era she represents with what she is wearing does not see a sword as a decoration- it is in fact a weapon intended for use. As such, the weapon has to be suited for the circumstances. One does not haul a heavy machinegun into a surgical drop strike. Nuclear devices at a border conflict are absurd. A sniper's skills are useless in a jungle so thick that visibility is less than 30 meters. And full-sized land swords are a liability onboard a ship- she might wear that to a political function in dress uniform, but not in battle.jwhouk wrote:She cuts quite a figure.
Of course not. That's what Daisy Cutters are for.Sgt. Howard wrote:One does not haul a heavy machinegun into a surgical drop strike.
1) You'll see paintings of Napoleonic War naval officers holding swords just as large, if not larger. These might not be the swords that they used in most shipboard actions, but they did have them and carry them around at times.Sgt. Howard wrote:THAT looks like an artillery saber- a naval commander would carry a cutlass. I know that sounds a bit nit-picky, but seriously- a full sized saber requires a lot of room to use and ships do not offer that. Any enemy she would face would be armed with cutlasses- a saber would be at a disadvantage because they cannot move as fast and can hang up on too many things. In open terrain, the saber would be the better choice because of it's reach. Remember, the era she represents with what she is wearing does not see a sword as a decoration- it is in fact a weapon intended for use. As such, the weapon has to be suited for the circumstances. One does not haul a heavy machinegun into a surgical drop strike. Nuclear devices at a border conflict are absurd. A sniper's skills are useless in a jungle so thick that visibility is less than 30 meters. And full-sized land swords are a liability onboard a ship- she might wear that to a political function in dress uniform, but not in battle.