Wapsi Square Forum

bmonk wrote:

Fairportfan wrote:Perhaps that turn of phrase means that, up until now, the existence of a jaguar girl has been a theoretical possibility, not an actuality?

Or that, effectively, there is only one Jaguar Girl at a time?

"There can only be ... ONE!"

Fairportfan wrote:

bmonk wrote:

Fairportfan wrote:Perhaps that turn of phrase means that, up until now, the existence of a jaguar girl has been a theoretical possibility, not an actuality?

Or that, effectively, there is only one Jaguar Girl at a time?

"There can only be ... ONE!"

It could also mean that she transcends time throughout quantum events. In other words, she is and always has been the Jaguar Girl.

Fairportfan wrote:

KnightDelight wrote:So, they're locked in, yet Wapsi canon says a given demon may be assigned to more than one host at the same time.

The important word there is "may" - which is permissive but not compulsory.

Gah...It's frustrating not remembering everything. For some reason I thought that Demons could not handle multiple hosts at the same time. Can someone link to where we learned otherwise?

Julie wrote:

Fairportfan wrote:

KnightDelight wrote:So, they're locked in, yet Wapsi canon says a given demon may be assigned to more than one host at the same time.

The important word there is "may" - which is permissive but not compulsory.

Gah...It's frustrating not remembering everything. For some reason I thought that Demons could not handle multiple hosts at the same time. Can someone link to where we learned otherwise?

I remember a bar/club scene where Jin and Monica were at odds while there demons looked on. Tina klunked their heads together from behind. What came out of that was demons may have/serve multiple hosts, but may Not play those hosts against each other. That was the demon law violation.

Atomic wrote:

Julie wrote:Gah...It's frustrating not remembering everything. For some reason I thought that Demons could not handle multiple hosts at the same time. Can someone link to where we learned otherwise?

I remember a bar/club scene where Jin and Monica were at odds while there demons looked on. Tina klunked their heads together from behind. What came out of that was demons may have/serve multiple hosts, but may Not play those hosts against each other. That was the demon law violation.

Oh yeah! And Tina said that M "must have shared her demons" with Jin...which I'd always thought happened when Bud found one of M's demons and then poited it into Jin as a practical joke...which I'm probably misunderstanding greatly.