Wapsi Square Forum

Minors have sex. It happens. some people bloom earlier, some people bloom later.

*shrug*

Honestly, I'm not really concerned about that sort of thing. If a person seems mature enough to handle the emotional implications and the physical risks, fine. Go do your thing. Just wear a gorram condom, because I highly doubt you're mature enough to raise a kid.

GlytchMeister wrote:Minors have sex. It happens. some people bloom earlier, some people bloom later.

*shrug*

Honestly, I'm not really concerned about that sort of thing. If a person seems mature enough to handle the emotional implications and the physical risks, fine. Go do your thing. Just wear a gorram condom, because I highly doubt you're mature enough to raise a kid.

?... which one wears the condom...?

I will point out that seventeen-year-olds having sex is one thing.

Portraying seventeen-year-olds in sexualised situations may well be another.

Gyrrakavian wrote:

jeffepp wrote:

shadowinthelight wrote:Nadette: "Oh noes, the strings accidentally slipped from my fingers..."

I think it would be more like: "OK, put your finger here. Now, put a finger from your other hand here. Oops, I seem to have tied up your hands, AND made your top WAY to tight. And, you know that knot I used it the kind that you can't untie for at least 30 minutes, sometimes a couple of hours, for reasons. What WILL we do till then?"

Aren't they both still 17?

I think they are still 16... and your point is?

Sgt. Howard wrote:

GlytchMeister wrote:Minors have sex. It happens. some people bloom earlier, some people bloom later.

*shrug*

Honestly, I'm not really concerned about that sort of thing. If a person seems mature enough to handle the emotional implications and the physical risks, fine. Go do your thing. Just wear a gorram condom, because I highly doubt you're mature enough to raise a kid.

?... which one wears the condom...?

I really couldn't say. One is an Ursamorph and I am pretty sure could "transform" a part that would fit into one, just not sure the transformation would be shooting blanks or not.

On the other hand, the big chested Siren/Incubus has been sprouting all kinds of parts of late, might need one on the pointy tail???

Or neither one because . . . neither one wants to do something that would require one in the first place.
Yep, going to go with neither one needs or wants one.

...I was referring more to minors in general. "Use protection" probably would have been better...

Warrl wrote:I think they are still 16... and your point is?

Don't know about Nadette - but Atsali just had her 17th birthday - you know, the pizza and games party Devyn dragged her off to?

Neither Atsali nor Nadette has ever actually had sex, but they both get plenty of tail from the other...

AnotherFairportfan wrote:I will point out that seventeen-year-olds having sex is one thing.

Portraying seventeen-year-olds in sexualised situations may well be another.

we are talking about an imaginary girl and her *girlfriend* in an imaginary world... nothing to do with RL , that has 'rules' about 'doing stuff' in the wrong place... :/

there other places, one on 34th street, eg...

illiad wrote:

AnotherFairportfan wrote:I will point out that seventeen-year-olds having sex is one thing.

Portraying seventeen-year-olds in sexualised situations may well be another.

we are talking about an imaginary girl and her *girlfriend* in an imaginary world... nothing to do with RL , that has 'rules' about 'doing stuff' in the wrong place... :/

there other places, one on 34th street, eg...

In what we laughingly like to call "The Real World" child pornography laws are drafted that could include comics like WS.

illiad wrote:

AnotherFairportfan wrote:I will point out that seventeen-year-olds having sex is one thing.

Portraying seventeen-year-olds in sexualised situations may well be another.

we are talking about an imaginary girl and her *girlfriend* in an imaginary world... nothing to do with RL , that has 'rules' about 'doing stuff' in the wrong place... :/

there other places, one on 34th street, eg...

There are potential legal problems with illustrating such . . . seriously. It's US law, it doesn't make sense.

--FreeFlier

AnotherFairportfan wrote:

illiad wrote:

AnotherFairportfan wrote:I will point out that seventeen-year-olds having sex is one thing.

Portraying seventeen-year-olds in sexualised situations may well be another.

we are talking about an imaginary girl and her *girlfriend* in an imaginary world... nothing to do with RL , that has 'rules' about 'doing stuff' in the wrong place... :/

there other places, one on 34th RULE, eg...

In what we laughingly like to call "The Real World" child pornography laws are drafted that could include comics like WS.

problem is, BAD things happen in RL... that is what the law is for..

Dave wrote:And, whatever they might do on the island might be entirely outside the scope of any effective civil law...

Nope. The US is one country that also makes it illegal for its citizens to do such things outside of the US.

Next year they can 'whoop-de-do'-

Catawampus wrote:

Dave wrote:And, whatever they might do on the island might be entirely outside the scope of any effective civil law...

Nope. The US is one country that also makes it illegal for its citizens to do such things outside of
the US.

Actually, that's more common than you think . . .

--FreeFlier

AnotherFairportfan wrote:

illiad wrote:

AnotherFairportfan wrote:I will point out that seventeen-year-olds having sex is one thing.

Portraying seventeen-year-olds in sexualised situations may well be another.

we are talking about an imaginary girl and her *girlfriend* in an imaginary world... nothing to do with RL , that has 'rules' about 'doing stuff' in the wrong place... :/

there other places, one on 34th street, eg...

In what we laughingly like to call "The Real World" child pornography laws are drafted that could include comics like WS.

[Rant]Don't get me wrong, i love this comic and i have it bookmarked and read the comic every day, but it seems that Paul hasn't gotten any really long-term story arc set up for any of his newer characters like he had in the Calendar Machine arc he did for Monica, The GG's, et. al... he seems to be doing random one-a-day gags, that while they are well done for what they are, overall they lack any coherency and continuity with the general in-comic universe that has been built up so far, as well as, in my opinion are getting WAAYY to specific about the sexual antics of minors than they really NEED to be, and personally, i wish he'd tone down the sexual related content a whole bunch... as it is, take a look at the number of times that he showed Monica or anyone else for that matter, in a sexually charged scene getting jiggy, versus the number of times that he's shown Atsali in a similarly sexually charged scene.... a massive difference isn't it? yes, i totally "get" that Atsali is going thru puberty, yadda, yadda ,etc and it's a "slice of life" comic, etc... but i am bloody positive that there is OTHER STUFF happening in her daily life, and her family and friends lives, that does NOT revolve around wing boners and Nadette getting her groove on... you know, stuff like Cricket's back story, and her family's history with Pickles creation. or maybe some more of Katherine's and Lily's life history revealed as they bond as mom and daughter... or maybe even Daylla's story, etc, etc, etc... and i just wish Paul would actually SHOW that kind of stuff again and lay off the sex for a while... [/Rant]

scantrontb:
Note he started this comic almost 16 years ago, and he has kids to take care of, and maybe *shock* has to do 'other work' to afford all that!!
I know he mentioned a while back he had to 'move across the border' for unmentioned reasons...

Best pic I could find was at Minnesota’s first indie comic book convention in 2010..

there are many other comics that show a LOT more, goto http://grrlpowercomic.com/ and look at bottom of page for NSFW stuff..
we don't want 'sensitive people' getting shocked, do we???? PM me if you cannot figure it out.. ; )

well maybe you should have a chat on his private FB?? or even here..

and NO i dont know much, I avoid the mania that is FB...

This year?? well he could be any of these places... http://thedevilspanties.com/conventions
be careful .. some of those convention links are 'script heavy' - a link 250 chrs long is not good for your browser...

illiad wrote: we don't want 'sensitive people' getting shocked, do we???? PM me if you cannot figure it out.. ; )

Well, I won't say I'm shocked... but terrible disturbed by the gratuitous expense involved.

Can you just imagine how much it must have cost, to melt down that many T-1000 Terminators to make those particular Heatwave hot tubs?

well now youve lost me... do explain or link WTH you mean....

illiad wrote: well now youve lost me... do explain or link WTH you mean....

From the page you like to (the main site) scroll down to the 2016 Valentine's Day Sex Drive item, and view his contribution on his DeviantArt site.