Page 2 of 2
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:42 pm
by Catawampus
lake_wrangler wrote:Sgt. Howard wrote:Somehow I doubt that top was purchased as a top- she just found out it could (sorta) work that way...
Given the way the top and bottom match, on the
link provided for us by jwhouk yesterday, my money's on it being sold as a "complete" outfit (for a certain definition of "complete"), or at least as a mix-and-match among similar items.
Perhaps she bought it as an outfit to wear for Nadette, while her mother thought that she was buying a cute hair-wrap. . .
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 7:58 pm
by AnotherFairportfan
illiad wrote:how many reflections do you see??...
One prominent one in each eye, and that would vary with the lighting and the viewing angle.
Katherine has three prominent reflections in each eye and always does, no matter what angle viewed from.
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:38 pm
by FreeFlier
Catawampus wrote:lake_wrangler wrote:Sgt. Howard wrote:Somehow I doubt that top was purchased as a top- she just found out it could (sorta) work that way...
Given the way the top and bottom match, on the
link provided for us by jwhouk yesterday, my money's on it being sold as a "complete" outfit (for a certain definition of "complete"), or at least as a mix-and-match among similar items.
Perhaps she bought it as an outfit to wear for Nadette, while her mother thought that she was buying a cute hair-wrap. . .
It could have been sold as a two-piece outfit with a matching bandana . . . and we haven't seen the actual top.
I am surprised Atsali's actually comfortable without a bra.
--FreeFlier
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:11 pm
by Warrl
FreeFlier wrote:I am surprised Atsali's actually comfortable without a bra.
Well, she's a siren/incubus, not a human. Maybe she's better designed for the load.
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:50 pm
by AnotherFairportfan
Warrl wrote:FreeFlier wrote:I am surprised Atsali's actually comfortable without a bra.
Well, she's a siren/incubus, not a human. Maybe she's better designed for the load.
She's getting her bras from Lydia.
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 12:00 am
by FreeFlier
AnotherFairportfan wrote:Warrl wrote:FreeFlier wrote:I am surprised Atsali's actually comfortable without a bra.
Well, she's a siren/incubus, not a human. Maybe she's better designed for the load.
She's getting her bras from Lydia.
Yes, which is why I'm surprised she's apparently not wearing one now.
--FreeFlier
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 12:13 am
by TazManiac
Atsali has ratched up the self-confident take on the body-image-issue thing since paying attentiion to the attention payed by the Ursomorph she hangs out with...
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:39 am
by Catawampus
AnotherFairportfan wrote:She's getting her bras from Lydia.
And perhaps her kerchiefs as well?
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:13 pm
by AnotherFairportfan
Catawampus wrote:AnotherFairportfan wrote:She's getting her bras from Lydia.
And perhaps her kerchiefs as well?
A non-Euclidean handkerchief top!
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:06 am
by Jabberwonky
AnotherFairportfan wrote:Catawampus wrote:AnotherFairportfan wrote:She's getting her bras from Lydia.
And perhaps her kerchiefs as well?
A non-Euclidean handkerchief top!
I can't picture Euclid wearing a handkerchief top, either...
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:29 am
by FreeFlier
AnotherFairportfan wrote:She's getting her bras from Lydia.
Catawampus wrote:And perhaps her kerchiefs as well?
AnotherFairportfan wrote:A non-Euclidean handkerchief top!
Jabberwonky wrote:I can't picture Euclid wearing a handkerchief top, either...
You are indeed fortunate . . .
--FreeFlier
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:06 am
by Catawampus
AnotherFairportfan wrote:Catawampus wrote:AnotherFairportfan wrote:She's getting her bras from Lydia.
And perhaps her kerchiefs as well?
A non-Euclidean handkerchief top!
"This Spring, only from Calvin and Felix Klein! Hyperbolic beyond hyperbole! Gauze with negative Gaussian curvature to positively cover your curves!"
Would that be worn at a Möbius strip club?
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:10 am
by DinkyInky
oldmanmickey wrote:Here she comes, look at that, look at that
There she goes, look at that, look at that
And she got Stali extra clothes
Oh, yes, they call her the Streak
Look at that, look at that
Fastest thing on two feet
Look at that, look at that
She's just as proud as she can be
Of her girls anatomy
but the public don't need a peek
Oh, yes, they call her the Streak
Look at that, look at that
Shes not lettin Stali show off her physique
Look at that, look at that
If there's an audience to be found
She'll be streakin' around
Preventin public critique
(with apologies to Ray Stevens)
Don't apologise to Ray! He still owes ME one for my kiddo learning that manoeuvre.
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:56 pm
by Just Old Al
Catawampus wrote:
Would that be worn at a Möbius strip club?
That's a really one-sided argument...
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:02 pm
by jwhouk
Just Old Al wrote:Catawampus wrote:
Would that be worn at a Möbius strip club?
That's a really one-sided argument...
"Pay the pun jar, dear," Daisy said without even looking up from her book.
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:40 pm
by FreeFlier
Just Old Al wrote:Catawampus wrote:Would that be worn at a Möbius strip club?
That's a really one-sided argument...
But at least it's a
Klein one . . .
/deposits a copy of
--And He Built a Crooked House in the pun jar/
--FreeFlier
Re: Not a Dress 2016-03-17
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:59 am
by Just Old Al
Wasn't that book banned by the Tesser Act of 1962?
Yeah, yeah, I know....deposits three of
these