Page 2 of 2
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:20 pm
by shadowinthelight
TazManiac wrote:lake_wrangler wrote:Nah... I'm expecting a future MIB movie to tell us he's just as alien as Dennis Rodman...

As is
Anne Hathaway...
And I suspect, Scarlett Johansson is too, once you get
under the skin
Too hot to be human? I can agree with that theory.
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 12:29 am
by Jabberwonky
Dave wrote:lake_wrangler wrote:Jabberwonky wrote:Yes, that's a miner floating on a pool of mercury. It's dense enough to float a human bean...
Can human
beings also float on it?
What's a human bean look like, anyway?

Audrey II? If eating beans causes humans to be flatulent, then eating humans causes beans to be... what?
I'd guess that the photo of the miner sitting on a tubfull of mercury might have been taken in California during the later years of the Gold Rush... or possibly in Alaska a bit later on. In either case, mercury was an important if dangerous part of the gold-mining industry. Partially sorted and pulverized gold-bearing ore was run through a "bath" in mercury, and the gold would dissolve into the liquid mercury and form an amalgam of the two metals. The gold-saturated mercury was then distilled away and captured for re-use, leaving the gold behind.
Nasty stuff. We're still dealing with mercury contamination in San Francisco Bay, more than a century later... runoff from the mercury mines south of here, and from the gold-mining sites in the Sierras. They're still doing some mitigation work at the old Almaden mercury mine, south of San Jose.
It was a big business at the time, though... and cut-throat-competitive. One big company managed to gain control of most of the mercury production, buying up all of the smaller mines, leaving the gold-miners no choice but to deal only with Amalgamated American Amalgams. "When the mercury rises, we're hot for your business!"
I first saw that picture in a Time Life book on, probably, geography. We had a series of Time/Life books on 'The World'. If I remember correctly, it's a South African miner at a mercury mine. But I haven't seen that book in almost 35 years, so I might not be all that correct.
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 12:30 am
by Jabberwonky
lake_wrangler wrote:Jabberwonky wrote:Yes, that's a miner floating on a pool of mercury. It's dense enough to float a human bean...
Can human
beings also float on it?
What's a human bean look like, anyway?

That much exposure to free mercury he's probably not bean a human for years now...
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 11:00 am
by TazManiac
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 2:24 pm
by Catawampus
Jabberwonky wrote:I first saw that picture in a Time Life book on, probably, geography. We had a series of Time/Life books on 'The World'. If I remember correctly, it's a South African miner at a mercury mine. But I haven't seen that book in almost 35 years, so I might not be all that correct.
October 1972 edition of
National Geographic Magazine. I think that he may be one of the cinnabar miners from the Almadén district of Spain.
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 11:43 am
by Jabberwonky
Dayquil or Nyquil?
(two of my favorite Pokemons)
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 1:26 pm
by Alkarii
Jabberwonky wrote:
Dayquil or Nyquil?
(two of my favorite Pokemons)
Mommy says I'm not supposed to take candy from strangers...
Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 7:35 pm
by Jabberwonky
And they don't get much stranger than this lot...

Re: Teotihuacan Mercury
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 5:30 am
by Catawampus
Jabberwonky wrote:And they don't get much stranger than this lot...

*
takes another sip of tasty Aztec mercury*
Say what, chap?