Re: Life Strategies 2014-04-01
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:50 am
A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
https://forum.wapsisquare.com/
Soaking up a Zen-like wisdom, and making it part of her life's outlook would seem to be natural for a tender young half-plant like Castela. Soto-synthesis, they call it.eee wrote:'Life strategies' would seem to be a more complex saying and concept than a five year old might normally have in their vocabulary; but then, Castela DOES live with Kath and visits Phix a lot. Little pitchers have big ears and she may have picked up a lot of concepts and words that children normally don't know. And in this case, she's using some of them correctly...
Well, she certainly used "That's BULLSHIT!" properly...eee wrote:'Life strategies' would seem to be a more complex saying and concept than a five year old might normally have in their vocabulary; but then, Castela DOES live with Kath and visits Phix a lot. Little pitchers have big ears and she may have picked up a lot of concepts and words that children normally don't know. And in this case, she's using some of them correctly...
Perhaps more of the Artful Dodger?jwhouk wrote:You do all have to remember she was abandoned and left at an orphanage. She's probably got some Oliver Twist in her.
Upon studying her torso carefully (always an onerous task, that, when involving the ladies from the Wapsi Square cast), her entire body is turned in the third panel when compared to the previous two. In one and two her torso was turned more towards the viewer's seven or eight o'clock, while in the last panel it's turned more towards five o'clock. So either Tina turned her body in the third panel, or else our point of view was shifted. Or we're seeing Tina through one of her eleven dimensions that we're not used to. Perhaps a little bit of all of the above.Dave wrote:I'd guess she turned her stance as well as her neck.Fairportfan wrote:Did Tina just turn her head more than ninety degrees anti-clockwise to look at Castela?
I mean, in the panel before, Castela is standing just behind Tina's left shoulder...
Rare in societies where kids are normally able to be sheltered and pampered. Very common in many other places where they have to grow up right away.Akasha wrote:to all here who don't think kids can be this way at an early age: well, they can be, it is just rare, and depends on what they have gone through.
Castela has been taking lessons on hair mobility from a Gorgon?KnightDelight wrote:Odd how their hair is blowing in opposite directions in the second frame.
If her emotional turmoil keeps on "leaking" out and affecting others as it has done, then it's going to be difficult to keep ignoring the problem.zachariah wrote:Tina does know she is being ignored and apparently is used to it. That is a shame.
Evilly cute?TheDOCTOR wrote:Castella. You had best NOT turn out to be EVIL.
You think that she's part Nepenthes and part corn plant?eee wrote:Little pitchers have big ears. . .
Yeah, when the typos were fixed, Tina (neck-down) was modified too. (As was the background in the last panel.)Catawampus wrote:Upon studying her torso carefully (always an onerous task, that, when involving the ladies from the Wapsi Square cast), her entire body is turned in the third panel when compared to the previous two.Dave wrote:I'd guess she turned her stance as well as her neck.Fairportfan wrote:Did Tina just turn her head more than ninety degrees anti-clockwise to look at Castela?
I mean, in the panel before, Castela is standing just behind Tina's left shoulder...
We know she's two-natured in at least one sense - she is a plant/animal hybrid. This might have some interesting implications for her mentality and personality... perhaps one aspect of her is more mature than the other?Treesong wrote:It's not just 'life strategies'. It's also 'difficult' for 'hard' and 'adults' for 'grownups' and being able to extract a nonobvious 'this' from Tina's complaint. Either she's two-natured or it's April Fool's Day.
The ones using animal/plant hybrid are doing so because Humans are classified as animals (and some animals may just be are far more humane than humans)davids4250 wrote:It seems to me that Castela must be a human-plant hybrid. The only animal form we have ever seen her in is human, so it follows that this is her "normal" animal form, or the easiest for her to assume. Also, she is very intelligent (moreso than most "ordinary" humans, says I) and there seem to be very few species that can say that.
Therefor, she is a human-plant hybrid, not just an animal-plant hybrid.
I have always assumed that she is part human, but people keep referring to her as "animal-plane" so I wanted to put in my two cents worth.
Which I have now done.
“No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity. But I know none, and therefore am no beast.”Mark N wrote:The ones using animal/plant hybrid are doing so because Humans are classified as animals (and some animals may just be are far more humane than humans)davids4250 wrote:It seems to me that Castela must be a human-plant hybrid. The only animal form we have ever seen her in is human, so it follows that this is her "normal" animal form, or the easiest for her to assume. Also, she is very intelligent (moreso than most "ordinary" humans, says I) and there seem to be very few species that can say that.
Therefor, she is a human-plant hybrid, not just an animal-plant hybrid.
I have always assumed that she is part human, but people keep referring to her as "animal-plane" so I wanted to put in my two cents worth.
Which I have now done.
Did anybody ever specify that it was just one species of animal, though? She could have human and rhinoceros and hummingbird DNA, for all that we know.davids4250 wrote:It seems to me that Castela must be a human-plant hybrid. The only animal form we have ever seen her in is human, so it follows that this is her "normal" animal form, or the easiest for her to assume. Also, she is very intelligent (moreso than most "ordinary" humans, says I) and there seem to be very few species that can say that.
Therefor, she is a human-plant hybrid, not just an animal-plant hybrid.
I have always assumed that she is part human, but people keep referring to her as "animal-plane" so I wanted to put in my two cents worth.
Which I have now done.
Wow, that must have been some party!Catawampus wrote:
Did anybody ever specify that it was just one species of animal, though? She could have human and rhinoceros and hummingbird DNA, for all that we know.