We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Need to talk about the day's episode of Wapsi? This is the place to do it. Play nice! ^_^

Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi

Forum rules
When two threads are posted for a day's comic, the thread posted first becomes the starting post. Please delete the second thread and add your post to the first thread. When naming the thread: Comic Name YYYY-MM-DD
Thanks guys! This keeps the forum nice and neat.
User avatar
illiad
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:33 am

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by illiad »

hey...yep, I dun got me a better 'un..... :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: da originul! :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Mark N
Posts: 1370
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:51 pm
Location: Central Florida

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Mark N »

I keep thinking about what Nudge said about the girls when she said that "lost souls have a habit of finding each other." How are the Ursas lost souls. I am kind of expecting a tearjerker comming up.
This message is brought to you by the "Let the artist know how much you LOVE his work" council.
User avatar
Sidhekin
Posts: 568
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:37 am
Location: Bergen, Norway
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Sidhekin »

zachariah wrote:As morphs why do they even have to show their tails? If they can simulate having clothes why not simulate having no tail?
If they present a so detailed simulation, they risk revealing too much.
perl -e 'print "Just another Perl ${\(trickster and hacker)},";'

The Sidhekin proves that Sidhe did it!
User avatar
illiad
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:33 am

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by illiad »

Sidhekin: yup, tails and fur cover a lot of stuff... thing is, I'll bet the wapsiverse is a lot more liberated than the 'comic code'... we just wont get to see it...


... unless Paul does an 'after dark' version for PG.. 8-)
zachariah
Posts: 1470
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:22 am

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by zachariah »

Sidhekin wrote:
zachariah wrote:As morphs why do they even have to show their tails? If they can simulate having clothes why not simulate having no tail?
If they present a so detailed simulation, they risk revealing too much.
Why? They lose the tail so they can wear the cloths. Then lose the fur so they don't over heat. As to riding up they can always simulate the underwear. While I am sure then can very nicely imitate the clothes we had best assume the fur changes to look like material. Or it would be like wearing body paint. While it does cover it still exposes.

As to wearing her sister as a hat, unless they changed the mass laws when the morph, her sisters weight must have given her a very sore neck, or back. Even comic physics has issues with transformation. You get a very heavy fly or a very light elephant unless magic is involved. So far in Wapsi it has been advanced technology that looks like magic.
Ambush questions are fun. Watching the mental impact of them as they distort, or crumble, opinions based on faulty logic.
User avatar
jwhouk
Posts: 6053
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 7:58 am
Location: The Valley of the Sun, Arizona
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by jwhouk »

jayessell wrote:Whoo-Hoo!
PS:
Paul? How many Ls in Castella?
One. For a full guide to the characters: go here. (PDF Document)
"Character is what you are in the dark." - D.L. Moody
"You should never run from the voices in your head. That's how you give them power." - Jin
loxmyth
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:07 am
Location: Somewhere near the Hub

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by loxmyth »

As to "why not just morph the tails out of the way" -- Tails are part of their natural shape; I presume morphing involves _some_ effort, and if you're in an environment where you can relax and be yourself -- and let folks see you as yourself -- that's probably psychologically more comfortable too.

Fur people are never completely naked. Not unless they shave, anyway.

I do find myself wondering about weather, though -- on the same basis that I boggle at the ladies who wear miniskirts in sub-zero temperatures. And I'd expect that they'd be willing to wear cloths when dealing with paint and oil and such, just as we would consider putting on an apron or overalls. Getting varnish out of fur would be unpleasant.
User avatar
Wdot
Posts: 352
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:32 pm

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Wdot »

Well, maybe the magic is purely illusionary; they don't change form, only appear to. So wearing clothes on top of their fur would be uncomfortably hot and underwear would interfere with their tails; they only wear the bear necessities.
Make the wrong things difficult, and the right things easy. Notice the smallest change and the slightest try and reward him.
----Ray Hunt
jayessell
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 8:09 am

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by jayessell »

loxmyth wrote:As to "why not just morph the tails out of the way" -- Tails are part of their natural shape; I presume morphing involves _some_ effort, and if you're in an environment where you can relax and be yourself -- and let folks see you as yourself -- that's probably psychologically more comfortable too.

Fur people are never completely naked. Not unless they shave, anyway.

I do find myself wondering about weather, though -- on the same basis that I boggle at the ladies who wear miniskirts in sub-zero temperatures. And I'd expect that they'd be willing to wear cloths when dealing with paint and oil and such, just as we would consider putting on an apron or overalls. Getting varnish out of fur would be unpleasant.
I think in a Minneapolis winter they would want a real winter coat as opposed to a simulated one.
In the first X-Men movie, when Mystique was impersonating Storm, did she scream when Wolverine cut the Storm cape because it was her skin???
User avatar
Fairportfan
Posts: 3283
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:14 am
Location: Atlanta (well, Gainesville)
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Fairportfan »

Wdot wrote:Well, maybe the magic is purely illusionary; they don't change form, only appear to. So wearing clothes on top of their fur would be uncomfortably hot and underwear would interfere with their tails; they only wear the bear necessities.
That was one heavy hat she wore into that theatre, then...
Not even duct tape can fix stupid. But it can muffle the noise.
=====================
Peace through superior firepower - ain't nothin' more peaceful than a dead troublemaker.
=====================
mike weber
User avatar
Yamara
Posts: 785
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:59 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Yamara »

zachariah wrote:As to wearing her sister as a hat, unless they changed the mass laws when the morph, her sisters weight must have given her a very sore neck, or back. Even comic physics has issues with transformation. You get a very heavy fly or a very light elephant unless magic is involved. So far in Wapsi it has been advanced technology that looks like magic.
loxmyth wrote:As to "why not just morph the tails out of the way" -- Tails are part of their natural shape; I presume morphing involves _some_ effort, and if you're in an environment where you can relax and be yourself -- and let folks see you as yourself -- that's probably psychologically more comfortable too.

Fur people are never completely naked. Not unless they shave, anyway.
Wdot wrote:Well, maybe the magic is purely illusionary; they don't change form, only appear to. So wearing clothes on top of their fur would be uncomfortably hot and underwear would interfere with their tails; they only wear the bear necessities.
jayessell wrote:In the first X-Men movie, when Mystique was impersonating Storm, did she scream when Wolverine cut the Storm cape because it was her skin???

*deep breath*

FERDS!!
PunPalsm the fastest way to pay the pun jar


Do Not Taunt Happy Fun Baal.
User avatar
Yamara
Posts: 785
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:59 pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Yamara »

And to add in my own ferdy cred, this probably shouldn't wig out Atsali too much, as the Library has been clothes-optional for quite awhile. Although I could imagine there being bureaucratic rules about what the orphan kids were supposed to see and wear. (A certain minotaur in short pants comes to mind.)

Phix is allowing more humans back in, and with her warnings to M & Shell, she is probably trying to anticipate every potential point of human contention. Body modesty + children are a big one.
PunPalsm the fastest way to pay the pun jar


Do Not Taunt Happy Fun Baal.
User avatar
NOTDilbert
Posts: 1065
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:39 am
Location: Western Arkansas, USA

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by NOTDilbert »

The "Party Tricks" comic a few days ago seems to show that either mass is based on form or ursagirls are hella strong.....
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" - Albert Einstein
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it DOES rhyme" - Mark Twain
"Always. Expect. Ninjas." - Syndey Scoville
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7606
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Dave »

Fairportfan wrote:
Wdot wrote:Well, maybe the magic is purely illusionary; they don't change form, only appear to. So wearing clothes on top of their fur would be uncomfortably hot and underwear would interfere with their tails; they only wear the bear necessities.
That was one heavy hat she wore into that theatre, then...
Yeah... if the magic is purely illusionary, then either it's capable of projecting a very misleading location for the ursamorph, or ursamorphs are incredibly strong. Holding a sister who equals your weight, up in the palm of your hand, and not falling over, would be quite a trick!

Sphinxes such as Shelly and Phix are able to change their size quite a lot, Nudge's human morph is somewhere around 30%-50% shorter than her horned morph, and it appears (not certain but likely) that their apparent mass changes along with their change in volume. We haven't seen any indication, for example, that Phix and Shelly are exceptionally light for their size when in sphinx form; in fact, as a sphinx Phix is heavy enough to crack the Library floor during a hard landing. Unless she loses mass somehow when morphing down, she'd have an annoying tendency to sink into the ground when walking, and those high-heeled shoes would be totally impractical. "Spiking" the asphalt is so out-of-style these days!

So, the ursamorphs may simply have access to the same ability, perhaps to an even greater degree.

It may be a bit like the inertialess drive in Garrett's "Backstage Lensman" tribute... something to the effect of "The drive was able to completely neutralize a ship's inertia, allowing the ship to instantly achieve velocities far greater than the speed of light. Unfortunately, while it eliminated inertial mass, it never could decide quite what to do about gravitational mass, which seemed to come and go as the situation required."
User avatar
illiad
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:33 am

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by illiad »

if you have ever seen 'Space 1999' , there is a girl who can morph right down to a mouse...

Or it could be like the tardis, where the 'mass' is actually in another dimension, all you see in *this dimension* is the 'shape' they push into it :ugeek:

or like Tsilla, a shadow that can project a 'complete' physically able body.. :)
kingklash
Posts: 1105
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:12 pm

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by kingklash »

illiad wrote:if you have ever seen 'Space 1999' , there is a girl who can morph right down to a mouse...

Or it could be like the tardis, where the 'mass' is actually in another dimension, all you see in *this dimension* is the 'shape' they push into it :ugeek:

or like Tsilla, a shadow that can project a 'complete' physically able body.. :)
Marvel Comics once explained that most of their size-shifters will shunt matter to and from a side dimension as their power demands. In fact, one character cured himself of a fatal disease by giving himself the infamous Pym Particle treatment, and then growing to giant-size, overwhelming the disease with brand new healthy cells, along with a boosted immunity factor, so when he shrank down, he had no trace of it in his body. Also recently demonstrated as Adventure Time's "Dog Liver times 51!" BIG LIIIVVVEEEERRRRRRRRR, YEAH!

It's not that Castela Loves Bud more than she does Atsali, It's just that what kid wouldn't run to get ice cream?
User avatar
GlytchMeister
Posts: 3734
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
Location: Central Illinois
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by GlytchMeister »

Perhaps shape-shifters in the Wapsiverse use the same theorized wormhole network the Golem Girls may use to point and to circumvent some unfortunate effects of Newton's 3rd law.

I recall a post from a while back (yes, I lurked for a very long time as a guest) here's a link.

So, the same wormhole network that is utilized by the Golem Girls (most notably, Bud's Golf Ball Drill Hurl and Bud's Calendar Machine Disposal Hurl) to absorb the immense equal and opposite forces and to transport their bodies intact (and their clothes... kinda intact most of the time) may be capable of handling the mass that is lost during transformation.

I wonder if it is possible to point something to be literally inside something else... Like the annoying Diviner Ulgo Monk from The Malloreon could leave people inside rocks by... Vibrating their atoms in such a way that the atoms could pass through each other's empty spaces. Or like the Flash could vibrate himself through barriers taking advantage of the same characteristic of atoms (I think... Although I'm a bit of a comic fan, I only know the most general and common information in both DC and Marvel).
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
User avatar
Fairportfan
Posts: 3283
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:14 am
Location: Atlanta (well, Gainesville)
Contact:

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Fairportfan »

kingklash wrote:It's not that Castela Loves Bud more than she does Atsali, It's just that what kid wouldn't run to get ice cream?
Besides, she's known Atsali most of her life.

Bud's NEW.
Not even duct tape can fix stupid. But it can muffle the noise.
=====================
Peace through superior firepower - ain't nothin' more peaceful than a dead troublemaker.
=====================
mike weber
User avatar
Hansontoons
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:22 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Hansontoons »

After all the shape-shifting discussion, anyone else wondering what the twins look like when they take human form?
Grantwhy
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:25 am

Re: We Have Tails 2013/12/09

Post by Grantwhy »

It's not entirely relevant to the discussion, but ...?

Sam the Eagle vs Nudity


:)
As a CareBearAnarchist I believe in the destruction and overthrow of the perils of society through random and senseless acts of consideration and kindness
Growing older is compulsory, growing up is optional
Dumb things happen to smart phones
Post Reply