Things that are usually too small to see ...

All off topic conversation held here. Have fun and play nice. =)

Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi

Post Reply
User avatar
AnotherFairportfan
Posts: 6402
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm

Things that are usually too small to see ...

Post by AnotherFairportfan »

... unless you're looking for them?

Image

Image

Image
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7584
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: Things that are usually too small to see ...

Post by Dave »

Are you suppressing the usual green color of foliage in those images?

If not, I'd say you have the nicest crop of slatevetch I've seen in a long time.
Warrl
Posts: 1723
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:44 pm

Re: Things that are usually too small to see ...

Post by Warrl »

Dave wrote:Are you suppressing the usual green color of foliage in those images?
Makes me think of our visit to Bryce Canyon a few years ago. I took a LOT of pictures. Unfortunately my phone somehow decided that ALL the pictures should be taken with a blue filter.

The color scheme of Bryce Canyon is very close to monochromatic - red, red, red, and for variety, red. Blue filter equals black-and-white photography.
User avatar
AnotherFairportfan
Posts: 6402
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm

Re: Things that are usually too small to see ...

Post by AnotherFairportfan »

Dave wrote:Are you suppressing the usual green color of foliage in those images?

If not, I'd say you have the nicest crop of slatevetch I've seen in a long time.
The Nikon has a "Selective Color" effect - you can choose up to three colours for it to reproduce, and render the rest as greyscale.

If there had been any small red flowers, i could have shown them, too.
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
Post Reply