Well, let's take a look at that.This is a great achievement of applied bioscience, but ANY other administration would have handled a pandemic better.
The Trump administration did a partial* shutdown of people coming to the US from China back in late January 2020 - and the Democrats criticized him, not for the "partial" (which would have made sense), but for the "shutdown".
The Trump administration strongly advised keeping COVID patients out of nursing homes. In at least two states with Democrat leadership, the response was to send COVID patients from hospitals to nursing homes.
The Trump administration also advised discouraging public gatherings. Democrat governors and mayors denounced that advice and responded with "party on!"
Then when things appeared to go on the proverbial journey by handbasket, Democrat governors and mayors started ordering the stuff the Trump administration had recommended - and condemned Trump for doing nothing, ignoring what he had done as well as the fact that up to that point they had done WORSE than nothing.
(And, meanwhile, in their own lives, continued - and some still continue - to "party on". Frequently in violation of the shutdowns they've decreed for everyone else. Of course, Trump also violated his administration's recommended guidelines a few times.)
So I think we can safely identify a whole group of potential administrations that likely would have done LESS well than the Trump administration: anything with a Democrat at the top.
(Oh, also we now have Democrats on record saying that government stimulus funding of research and other projects accomplishes nothing.)
* Partial: US citizens and legal residents were allowed to return home after visiting China, and not isolated, tested, monitored, or tracked. This was a mistake. But the partial shutdown was better than nothing.