... unless you're looking for them?
Things that are usually too small to see ...
Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi
- AnotherFairportfan
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm
Things that are usually too small to see ...
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
Re: Things that are usually too small to see ...
Are you suppressing the usual green color of foliage in those images?
If not, I'd say you have the nicest crop of slatevetch I've seen in a long time.
If not, I'd say you have the nicest crop of slatevetch I've seen in a long time.
Re: Things that are usually too small to see ...
Makes me think of our visit to Bryce Canyon a few years ago. I took a LOT of pictures. Unfortunately my phone somehow decided that ALL the pictures should be taken with a blue filter.Dave wrote:Are you suppressing the usual green color of foliage in those images?
The color scheme of Bryce Canyon is very close to monochromatic - red, red, red, and for variety, red. Blue filter equals black-and-white photography.
- AnotherFairportfan
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm
Re: Things that are usually too small to see ...
The Nikon has a "Selective Color" effect - you can choose up to three colours for it to reproduce, and render the rest as greyscale.Dave wrote:Are you suppressing the usual green color of foliage in those images?
If not, I'd say you have the nicest crop of slatevetch I've seen in a long time.
If there had been any small red flowers, i could have shown them, too.
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.