A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
http://forum.wapsisquare.com/
hssjwhouk wrote:On the face of things, there's nothing to face.
"Never use a huldra for manual labor. They simply can't put their back into it."AnotherFairportfan wrote:hssjwhouk wrote:On the face of things, there's nothing to face.
Tentacle?? Ok who been putting tentacle porn in the jar again??Atomic wrote:"Never use a huldra for manual labor. They simply can't put their back into it."AnotherFairportfan wrote:hssjwhouk wrote:On the face of things, there's nothing to face.
Nyah!
Tosses Norse Mythology book in the general direction of the Pun Jar. A tentacle reaches forth....
Or a tongue as such, or vocal cords, probably.eee wrote:I'm kind of wondering how Valerie speaks. From what we've seen, she doesn't have any lips...
Hexadecimal had no trouble speaking...eee wrote:I'm kind of wondering how Valerie speaks. From what we've seen, she doesn't have any lips... Of course, when you're dealing with someone who looks like they come from the wrong side of the Lovecraft mythos, that's probably a minor difficulty.
Perhaps in similar manner to how a certain talkative bundle of vines manages. Or she could have a whole bunch of lips and mouths and whatever else, in the same place where all of those tentacles come out from.eee wrote:I'm kind of wondering how Valerie speaks. From what we've seen, she doesn't have any lips... Of course, when you're dealing with someone who looks like they come from the wrong side of the Lovecraft mythos, that's probably a minor difficulty.
If she gets a diadem with twelve faces on it, she could cosplay as a character from The Phantom Tollbooth!Catawampus wrote:Maybe Valerie can get a decoration like Bia's diadem, only with multiple expressions available on it. Her tentacles could reach up and switch it over to whichever expression was appropriate for the moment.
There was a character in Marvel's Excalibur who had a diadem which reflected his emotions. Also a villain in Adam Warren's Dirty Pair had a headband which showed his current thoughts (in words).Catawampus wrote:Maybe Valerie can get a decoration like Bia's diadem, only with multiple expressions available on it.
Agatha Heterodyne's friend Zeetha has a headband that matches her expression.Chaise Murphy wrote:There was a character in Marvel's Excalibur who had a diadem which reflected his emotions. Also a villain in Adam Warren's Dirty Pair had a headband which showed his current thoughts (in words).Catawampus wrote:Maybe Valerie can get a decoration like Bia's diadem, only with multiple expressions available on it.
Ten minutes of web-trawling has failed to turn up pictures. If I find some in the next 24 hours I'll post them.
lake_wrangler wrote:A certain green-haired warrior princess from Skifander has one such headband, with an ever-changing smiley face...
* SNAP *AnotherFairportfan wrote:Agatha Heterodyne's friend Zeetha has a headband that matches her expression.
What can I say: "great minds think alike"...AnotherFairportfan wrote:Both with the same timestamp:lake_wrangler wrote:A certain green-haired warrior princess from Skifander has one such headband, with an ever-changing smiley face...* SNAP *AnotherFairportfan wrote:Agatha Heterodyne's friend Zeetha has a headband that matches her expression.
And here's a very good example of it.lake_wrangler wrote:A certain green-haired warrior princess from Skifander has one such headband, with an ever-changing smiley face...
I hadn't noticed you writing this, before quoting both our posts, or I would have mentioned it earlier...AnotherFairportfan wrote:Both with the same timestamp:
* bleeah *lake_wrangler wrote:I hadn't noticed you writing this, before quoting both our posts, or I would have mentioned it earlier...AnotherFairportfan wrote:Both with the same timestamp:
Technically, that's not quite correct: I have my forum preferences set to display the seconds, on the timestamp, and my post preceded yours by a full 27 seconds...
Fixed that for you, and you're welcome. I assume your seconds will be talking with his seconds?AnotherFairportfan wrote:* bleeah *lake_wrangler wrote:I hadn't noticed you writing this, before quoting both our posts, or I would have mentioned it earlier...AnotherFairportfan wrote:Both with the same timestamp:
Technically, that's not quite correct: I have my forum preferences set to display the seconds, on the timestamp, and my post preceded yours by a full 27 seconds...
* bleah encore *Dave wrote:Fixed that for you, and you're welcome. I assume your seconds will be talking with his seconds?AnotherFairportfan wrote:* bleeah *lake_wrangler wrote:I hadn't noticed you writing this, before quoting both our posts, or I would have mentioned it earlier...
Technically, that's not quite correct: I have my forum preferences set to display the seconds, on the timestamp, and my post preceded yours by a full 27 seconds...
