Page 1 of 2

Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:31 am
by shadowinthelight

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:33 am
by Cheesy1
So she was blinded by science? :P

And now it appears we are being narrated at by Adult Castela?

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:41 am
by Dave
And she was kicking Timothy?!? :shock:

(Places a large slice of Shoo-Fly Pie into the Pun Jar.)

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:08 am
by Atomic
"Good heavens Miss Yakamoto -- you're Beautiful!"

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:19 am
by AnotherFairportfan
Cheesy1 wrote:So she was blinded by science? :P

And now it appears we are being narrated at by Adult Castela?
Nah. Ten or twelve year old Castela - remember the sudden bursts of eloquence she used to hit us with when she was five.

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 4:04 am
by TheCollector
AnotherFairportfan wrote:
Cheesy1 wrote:So she was blinded by science? :P

And now it appears we are being narrated at by Adult Castela?
Nah. Ten or twelve year old Castela - remember the sudden bursts of eloquence she used to hit us with when she was five.
And now that's how she talks a majority of the time and I love it!!

Older Castela is just my favorite thing ever.

But if I may say one thing to Castela, forget the short kid! Go for girls like your sister, and me. :3

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:42 am
by Drakkenmensch
Are we headed into a second time skip?

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:36 am
by eee
Whoa, she's got it much worse for Timothy than it appeared.

I can see her and Agatha Heterodyne shouting "SCIENCE!!" and working together to discover things Man Was Not Meant To Know. Which is fine, because they're women. I doubt Agatha would turn a hair at Castela. I'm not sure the reverse is true.
Drakkenmensch wrote:Are we headed into a second time skip?
Third or maybe fourth, and I hope not. We're already up to at least 2026. A few more and we'll be into the 22nd Century.

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:53 pm
by oldmanmickey
Somebody needs to tell her that the male never looses interest and to get his attention all she has to do is say hi.

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 3:00 pm
by Alkarii
I wouldn't say never. I've lost interest in a good number of girls/women.

Re: Science 2016-07-14

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:04 pm
by oldmanmickey
    Alkarii wrote:I wouldn't say never. I've lost interest in a good number of girls/women.
    So have i but we are talking teens and tweens here. I got 2 grandboys that age and believe me if its female and she will talk to them, they interested. Of course luckily they are also at the age where like dogs chasing a car they aint sure what to do if they catch one.

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:34 pm
    by Alkarii
    And at that age, I'd still lost interest in more than one girl. Usually because they would insult me.

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:56 pm
    by Sgt. Howard
    Lost interest in the individual, but never the gender...

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:06 pm
    by FreeFlier
    Alkarii wrote:And at that age, I'd still lost interest in more than one girl. Usually because they would insult me.
    Or because they smoked . . .

    --FreeFlier

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:27 pm
    by Alkarii
    Oh, good lord, I forgot all about that! Ugh, smoking... I grew to hate it, because as a kid, we'd go to my aunt's place, and she smoked, and we'd be there a while. After a while, my chest would hurt, but I don't remember if it was heartburn or a breathing issue.

    Either way, I don't like the smell of tobacco smoke.

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:40 pm
    by FreeFlier
    I'm allergic to tobacco in any form, and to smoke of any kind.

    --FreeFlier

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 3:54 am
    by GlytchMeister
    FreeFlier wrote:I'm allergic to tobacco in any form, and to smoke of any kind.

    --FreeFlier
    Allergic. To smoke.

    Ok, dude, I know tobacco and weed smells bad, but omg I'm so, so sorry. Campfires, fireplaces, bonfires, burnt marshmallows, candles, oil lamps, tiki torches, smoked meats, bbq, fireworks, and generally just lighting random shit on fire to see how it reacts...

    I mean, jeeze, I would HATE to be allergic to smoke.

    ...Tire smoke from burnouts! I can probably keep going! Augh!

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:45 am
    by Alkarii
    Don't forget burning shit with a magnifying glass.

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 8:37 am
    by FreeFlier
    It's not an anaphalactic (sp?) shock type of allergy, but it's a definite pain because continued exposure will make me sick.

    Which is a real pain when someone in the neighborhood is burning landclearing debris, especially when they don't let it dry enough so it smolders for days.

    --FreeFlier

    Re: Science 2016-07-14

    Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:10 am
    by Dave
    GlytchMeister wrote:I mean, jeeze, I would HATE to be allergic to smoke.

    ...Tire smoke from burnouts! I can probably keep going! Augh!
    It would wreck the mad-scientist gig, that's for sure. Experience gained is directly proportional to equipment destroyed, and electronic equipment in particular is powered by the Magic Blue Smoke stored in the circuitry.