Re: Full of Hugs 2014-12-18
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 9:33 pm
You say that like it's a bad thing.lake_wrangler wrote:So yes, there are plenty of bit parts being offered to guys... just not very many lasting roles...
A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
http://forum.wapsisquare.com/
You say that like it's a bad thing.lake_wrangler wrote:So yes, there are plenty of bit parts being offered to guys... just not very many lasting roles...
I'm sure many people like to see lots of positive female roles, played by many physically attractive ladies... but have you ever heard of the saying "too much of a good thing"? There has to be some balance, at some point...Thor wrote:You say that like it's a bad thing.lake_wrangler wrote:So yes, there are plenty of bit parts being offered to guys... just not very many lasting roles...
There's an awful lot of stories--a fairly huge amount really--with a large sprawling cast, but with a total amount of female characters that could be counted on a single shop-teacher's hand.lake_wrangler wrote:I'm sure many people like to see lots of positive female roles, played by many physically attractive ladies... but have you ever heard of the saying "too much of a good thing"? There has to be some balance, at some point...Thor wrote:You say that like it's a bad thing.lake_wrangler wrote:So yes, there are plenty of bit parts being offered to guys... just not very many lasting roles...
(Emphasis mine)Thor wrote:There's an awful lot of stories--a fairly huge amount really--with a large sprawling cast, but with a total amount of female characters that could be counted on a single shop-teacher's hand.
If I tried, I could probably count close to as many guys as the list I just made of girl characters. However, they ALL have supporting cast roles, with diminishing importance from there. So while there may be almost a balance on the number fo characters, there is a definite imbalance on the importance of the roles assigned to each gender in this story.Thor wrote:There doesn't have to be some balance; this is some balance.
I was gonna mention that if you hadn't.Opus the Poet wrote: See: "Bechdel test" for more examples.
Thank you. Wapsi has been a near-perfect example of a franchise that "fails the gender-reversed Bechdel test", something that is rarer than rooster's teeth.Opus the Poet wrote:You're missing the point. It isn't that this cast lacks main females, it's that most other webcomics (and other "entertainment") has all to majority male casts. I have seen some where the only female in the cast was only there as fan service, and did nothing to move the story along. See: "Bechdel test" for more examples.
BUT what does REAL LIFE have to do with a comic????? boooooring...Yamara wrote:Thank you. Wapsi has been a near-perfect example of a franchise that "fails the gender-reversed Bechdel test", something that is rarer than rooster's teeth.Opus the Poet wrote:You're missing the point. It isn't that this cast lacks main females, it's that most other webcomics (and other "entertainment") has all to majority male casts. I have seen some where the only female in the cast was only there as fan service, and did nothing to move the story along. See: "Bechdel test" for more examples.
Examples in Wapsi of two male characters who have a conversation about something other than a woman, number only about two or three, and I believe all of them are merely trivial tangents to much more important discussions of a woman character: Tepoz chides Kukulcan for his dress sense after being assigned guardianship of Monica. Kevin and Alan trade barbs about Magnum, P.I. after a deep discussion about M's aggressiveness.
I think all other dialogue are about their girlfriends. Generally male characters in Wapsi don't speak to one another "on screen" at all.
Pablo is on record as having never heard of the Bechdel test until years after he began the strip; he just likes telling stories the way he does.
Note that the "test" is really more a social thought experiment to raise awareness of the lack of depth of women's stories in most media, than a hard and fast litmus of artistic worth or intentional sexism. Kind of like how Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment in the philosophy of quantum physics and not an actual physics experiment to attempt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechdel_test
Akeche wrote:I won't deny I'm surprised my comment sparked such conversation, but I don't see that as a bad thing.
A lot of people... Trying not to name them, seem to get really defensive at the sheer idea of there being some actually important male characters in the story as well.
Nowhere near 99%, we've only "lost" Owen (and he's eloped with Lakshmi, not dead), and Darren had an appropriate send-off. Tepoz is AWOL, but he's immortal. We'll see him again. No other boy is more absent than, say, Jacqui, Luci or Heather.Akeche wrote:Prior to him being given The Bus treatment, Darren was maybe the most important man in the entire comic because of the wisdom he would dish out to the rest of the cast. After he was brushed away, I'd say it was probably Justin for a good while, as all the other boyfriends were in the background. Maybe that's because he was a paranormal all along? I don't know how Paul does the writing, so whether he was planned to be what he turned out to be is hard to say.
Over the years the comic turned from... slice of life, of a girl and her friends getting sucked into some really weird shit. Into, as it says now, A Slice of Supernatural Life! Seeing as how much of our cast has either become supernatural themselves or know the truth of it.
There's a problem with that though. In the transition, we've lost 99% of the male characters.
And the buildup to the cute boy in Atsali's diary has been going on for a year. Wapsiworld isn't running out of men, or even women doting on them. They're just not the stars of the show.Akeche wrote:If Atsali's little group of friends is going to be like a... to use my own example from another post her "Girl Meets World" to Monica's "Boy Meets World" we'll have to get at least one dude into the group of friends.
hey if you know a comic as good, SFW but with mainly males, please do link it...Opus the Poet wrote: So the main reason most of you guys (and gals) are here is the stories and the characters that happen to be mostly female.
The conversation about the female-to-male ratio in Wapsi Square has been going on for quite some time now, but if you want to take credit for starting it, knock yourself out.Akeche wrote:I won't deny I'm surprised my comment sparked such conversation, but I don't see that as a bad thing.
Um, I haven't seen this. People here are debating the merits of the argument, not attacking the people making the arguments.Yamara wrote:Yeah, there's a natural human tendency to go argumentum ad personum when one feels the other person in the conversation isn't listening.