Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:56 am
Since it was sort of posted in 'Parabook', not so much...TheDOCTOR wrote:One of those "What happens in Vegas, STAYS in Vegas" - type deals?
A place to discuss the world of Wapsi Square
http://forum.wapsisquare.com/
Since it was sort of posted in 'Parabook', not so much...TheDOCTOR wrote:One of those "What happens in Vegas, STAYS in Vegas" - type deals?
I imagine that the really juicy stuff wouldn't be posted there, unless parabook is less like facebook and more like pornhub...ChattaStarhawk wrote:Since it was sort of posted in 'Parabook', not so much...TheDOCTOR wrote:One of those "What happens in Vegas, STAYS in Vegas" - type deals?
More like wallowing in it . . .Drakkenmensch wrote:Too late! My mind has made its gutter and is wading in it!!!starkruzr wrote:I don't think we actually know that yet. Paul has been suggestive like this before only to reveal that the conversation was actually about innocent fun.TheCollector wrote:I KNEW IT!!
Yesterday I was gonna say something, but I decided not to, and now I see I should of!
So. I can't exactly remember years worth of comics, but did we already know Kath was into women?
I would also just like to say that I love this so f--king much!!!!<3
Yes, well, what I've been meaning to mention, ever since yesterday at least, is that what we don't know is that while these two had fun doing 'something', who’s to say there weren’t Others there during the fun as well.oldmanmickey wrote:Its all very interesting but we really dont know if she is or not. Since there is no male obviously involved it doesnt matter if the evidence is able to stand up in court. Drops his copy of a 1001 puns in the pun jar
That's true... but, just remember that there is precedent for the sudden unexpected appearance of heart symbols, plus slightly-lowered eyelids, ending up being very significant indeed.TazManiac wrote:Yes, well, what I've been meaning to mention, ever since yesterday at least, is that what we don't know is that while these two had fun doing 'something', who’s to say there weren’t Others there during the fun as well.
Well, stop that! You're blocking our skylight!Drakkenmensch wrote:Too late! My mind has made its gutter and is wading in it!!!
ISWYDT.Dave wrote:That's true... but, just remember that there is precedent for the sudden unexpected appearance of heart symbols, plus slightly-lowered eyelids, ending up being very significant indeed.TazManiac wrote:Yes, well, what I've been meaning to mention, ever since yesterday at least, is that what we don't know is that while these two had fun doing 'something', who’s to say there weren’t Others there during the fun as well.
Not that Pablo is under any obligation to follow precedent or steer the strip in a straight line, mind you.
Actually, that one was a "no pun intended", Joe... hadn't even thought of it myself until you pointed it out.jwhouk wrote:ISWYDT.
Consider what might happen if you were a female paranormal or immortal surrounded constantly by other gorgeous, strong and incredibly sexy female paranormals. I think that would color anyone's perception, especially in a world where being gay is not seen as anything out of the norm.Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?
If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear.
My money's on Ghandi. Every time I ever faced him in civilization, his bloodthirsty conquest always steamrolled my fledgling dominion. Do not mess with Ghandi!!!(Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
There was the bit where she took her pet fish (either a beta or a gold fish) for a walk, but I'm not sure if anything happened between her and the fellow that helped change the farty fish's water.starkruzr wrote:I don't think we actually know that yet. Paul has been suggestive like this before only to reveal that the conversation was actually about innocent fun.TheCollector wrote:I KNEW IT!!
Yesterday I was gonna say something, but I decided not to, and now I see I should of!
So. I can't exactly remember years worth of comics, but did we already know Kath was into women?
I would also just like to say that I love this so f--king much!!!!<3
Are you implying that Katherine and the faunette were getting Debussy together?Opus the Poet wrote:prelude to afternoon of a faun?
Me, puns? Are you sure about that? Oh well, I suppose that I can contribute a few bucks, if I can spare the doe.GlytchMeister wrote:You and Cat still owe the Pun Jar, by the way. Big time.
Don't let them get your goat. Some day you'll look back at all of this with fauned memories.GlytchMeister wrote:*eye twitch*
I will haunt you all.
And a house in Pompeii?Dave wrote:It actually makes perfect sense. Fauns, like dryads, are paranormal creatures of the woodlands. This one (we don't yet know her name, alas) probably owns a rustic cabin made of naughty pine.
Perhaps Katherine's soul is 1/6 (at least) male?Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?
If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
Ever since the day Monica dumped Kevin, there is indeed a surge of fresh lesbian characters in the Waspiverse. But is that a problem ? (and I don't mean just fauning over hot ladies in various state of undress)Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?
If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
I think if you look at all other *popular* PG13 to R comics, you will find it is very much the norm...Swedish Chef wrote:Ever since the day Monica dumped Kevin, there is indeed a surge of fresh lesbian characters in the Waspiverse. But is that a problem ? (and I don't mean just fauning over hot ladies in various state of undress)Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?
If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
As Catawampus pointed out, the demographic plays a part. The Waspiverse is a very sexually active place. Even Charon, of all people, has a kid. Still warping my mind around that one. That Katherine's current version has a sex life doesn't come as a surprise to no one. As to say whether or not she's lesbian, bisexual or just has a horn fetish is up to Paul. That doesn't make her less interesting a character.
Otoh, and I join you here, there are zero interesting male characters onboard currently. Even Justin's background, rich as it was, was never exploited/used at all. And he was the last new face I can think of. Tepoz, a thing of the past. Alan and Jin have kind of living in marital bliss. As for Owen and Lakshmi, they might live in another world for all we know.
Someday it may change, but for now, female horn it is.
You die now.Swedish Chef wrote:Nothing new here, after all the Internet is for horn.
{hyperventilating}AnotherFairportfan wrote:You die now.Swedish Chef wrote:Nothing new here, after all the Internet is for horn.