Page 2 of 4

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:56 am
by ChattaStarhawk
TheDOCTOR wrote:One of those "What happens in Vegas, STAYS in Vegas" - type deals?
Since it was sort of posted in 'Parabook', not so much...

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:16 pm
by Dave
It actually makes perfect sense. Fauns, like dryads, are paranormal creatures of the woodlands. This one (we don't yet know her name, alas) probably owns a rustic cabin made of naughty pine.

(Glytchmeister, I recommend using a warm washcloth on the face - it relaxes the muscles and can help relieve that bothersome eye-twitch).

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:17 pm
by Drakkenmensch
ChattaStarhawk wrote:
TheDOCTOR wrote:One of those "What happens in Vegas, STAYS in Vegas" - type deals?
Since it was sort of posted in 'Parabook', not so much...
I imagine that the really juicy stuff wouldn't be posted there, unless parabook is less like facebook and more like pornhub...

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 2:18 pm
by FreeFlier
Drakkenmensch wrote:
starkruzr wrote:
TheCollector wrote:I KNEW IT!!

Yesterday I was gonna say something, but I decided not to, and now I see I should of!

So. I can't exactly remember years worth of comics, but did we already know Kath was into women?

I would also just like to say that I love this so f--king much!!!! :D <3
I don't think we actually know that yet. Paul has been suggestive like this before only to reveal that the conversation was actually about innocent fun.
Too late! My mind has made its gutter and is wading in it!!!
More like wallowing in it . . . ;)

Juicy details . . .

Katherine tried to eat a really ripe mango?

--FreeFlier

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:25 pm
by oldmanmickey
Its all very interesting but we really dont know if she is or not. Since there is no male obviously involved it doesnt matter if the evidence is able to stand up in court. Drops his copy of a 1001 puns in the pun jar

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:39 pm
by TazManiac
oldmanmickey wrote:Its all very interesting but we really dont know if she is or not. Since there is no male obviously involved it doesnt matter if the evidence is able to stand up in court. Drops his copy of a 1001 puns in the pun jar
Yes, well, what I've been meaning to mention, ever since yesterday at least, is that what we don't know is that while these two had fun doing 'something', who’s to say there weren’t Others there during the fun as well.

"I know we just met and everything, but you seem cool... and I'm going to (a) party in a little while and I was wondering if you wanted to go along, seeing as how we're both on vacation and everything...".

This is not PornHub, The is LitErotica...

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:50 pm
by Dave
TazManiac wrote:Yes, well, what I've been meaning to mention, ever since yesterday at least, is that what we don't know is that while these two had fun doing 'something', who’s to say there weren’t Others there during the fun as well.
That's true... but, just remember that there is precedent for the sudden unexpected appearance of heart symbols, plus slightly-lowered eyelids, ending up being very significant indeed.

Not that Pablo is under any obligation to follow precedent or steer the strip in a straight line, mind you. :)

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:10 pm
by Warrl
Drakkenmensch wrote:Too late! My mind has made its gutter and is wading in it!!!
Well, stop that! You're blocking our skylight!

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:55 pm
by jwhouk
Dave wrote:
TazManiac wrote:Yes, well, what I've been meaning to mention, ever since yesterday at least, is that what we don't know is that while these two had fun doing 'something', who’s to say there weren’t Others there during the fun as well.
That's true... but, just remember that there is precedent for the sudden unexpected appearance of heart symbols, plus slightly-lowered eyelids, ending up being very significant indeed.

Not that Pablo is under any obligation to follow precedent or steer the strip in a straight line, mind you. :)
ISWYDT.

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:07 pm
by Dave
jwhouk wrote:ISWYDT.
Actually, that one was a "no pun intended", Joe... hadn't even thought of it myself until you pointed it out.

I'm not sure whether this means the Pun Jar owes me a rebate, or whether I have to pay double. :?

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:18 pm
by Alkarii
It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?

If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:57 pm
by Drakkenmensch
Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?

If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear.
Consider what might happen if you were a female paranormal or immortal surrounded constantly by other gorgeous, strong and incredibly sexy female paranormals. I think that would color anyone's perception, especially in a world where being gay is not seen as anything out of the norm.
(Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
My money's on Ghandi. Every time I ever faced him in civilization, his bloodthirsty conquest always steamrolled my fledgling dominion. Do not mess with Ghandi!!!

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:18 pm
by Gyrrakavian
starkruzr wrote:
TheCollector wrote:I KNEW IT!!

Yesterday I was gonna say something, but I decided not to, and now I see I should of!

So. I can't exactly remember years worth of comics, but did we already know Kath was into women?

I would also just like to say that I love this so f--king much!!!! :D <3
I don't think we actually know that yet. Paul has been suggestive like this before only to reveal that the conversation was actually about innocent fun.
There was the bit where she took her pet fish (either a beta or a gold fish) for a walk, but I'm not sure if anything happened between her and the fellow that helped change the farty fish's water.

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:31 pm
by Catawampus
We don't even seem to have a name yet for this individual who may have been faundling Katherine. I wonder if this will be one of those incidents that is never really fully revealed.

And will we find out what Castela was going to ask her sister yesterday upon returning from the Library, before Atsali interrupted her?
Opus the Poet wrote:prelude to afternoon of a faun?
Are you implying that Katherine and the faunette were getting Debussy together?
GlytchMeister wrote:You and Cat still owe the Pun Jar, by the way. Big time.
Me, puns? Are you sure about that? Oh well, I suppose that I can contribute a few bucks, if I can spare the doe.
GlytchMeister wrote:*eye twitch*

I will haunt you all.
Don't let them get your goat. Some day you'll look back at all of this with fauned memories.
Dave wrote:It actually makes perfect sense. Fauns, like dryads, are paranormal creatures of the woodlands. This one (we don't yet know her name, alas) probably owns a rustic cabin made of naughty pine.
And a house in Pompeii?

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:34 pm
by Catawampus
Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?

If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
Perhaps Katherine's soul is 1/6 (at least) male?

The only really gay major female characters I can think of are Nadette and Heather (and Heather showed some slight interest in Owen before moving on to Shelly). The rest have shown interest in men, men and women, or not much interest in anybody. Which doesn't really sound too far off from the real-life demographics, from what I recall of them. Especially given how many of these characters are either not raised in current society or in human society. . .or in a few cases not in either.

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:17 am
by Swedish Chef
Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?

If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
Ever since the day Monica dumped Kevin, there is indeed a surge of fresh lesbian characters in the Waspiverse. But is that a problem ? (and I don't mean just fauning over hot ladies in various state of undress)

As Catawampus pointed out, the demographic plays a part. The Waspiverse is a very sexually active place. Even Charon, of all people, has a kid. Still warping my mind around that one. That Katherine's current version has a sex life doesn't come as a surprise to no one. As to say whether or not she's lesbian, bisexual or just has a horn fetish is up to Paul. That doesn't make her less interesting a character.

Otoh, and I join you here, there are zero interesting male characters onboard currently. Even Justin's background, rich as it was, was never exploited/used at all. And he was the last new face I can think of. Tepoz, a thing of the past. Alan and Jin have kind of living in marital bliss. As for Owen and Lakshmi, they might live in another world for all we know.

Someday it may change, but for now, female horn it is.

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:01 am
by illiad
Swedish Chef wrote:
Alkarii wrote:It's getting kind of annoying, actually. It's like almost every female character winds up a lesbian. Are males only there for procreation, existing in the comic only because a character may think about having kids, or to be present enough for a female to determine that she's not interested in males?

If you notice, all the straight characters either disappear, or are just seen so little that they are simply background characters now, regardless of how prominent they may have been in the past. Or, they could be like Monica, and just up and leave a guy just because a woman shows interest, and then completely disappear. (Though, in Monica's case for disappearing, I'm pretty sure it's difficult to write an interesting story for her now. It'd be like watching a fight between Genghis Khan and Mahatma Gandhi.)
Ever since the day Monica dumped Kevin, there is indeed a surge of fresh lesbian characters in the Waspiverse. But is that a problem ? (and I don't mean just fauning over hot ladies in various state of undress)

As Catawampus pointed out, the demographic plays a part. The Waspiverse is a very sexually active place. Even Charon, of all people, has a kid. Still warping my mind around that one. That Katherine's current version has a sex life doesn't come as a surprise to no one. As to say whether or not she's lesbian, bisexual or just has a horn fetish is up to Paul. That doesn't make her less interesting a character.

Otoh, and I join you here, there are zero interesting male characters onboard currently. Even Justin's background, rich as it was, was never exploited/used at all. And he was the last new face I can think of. Tepoz, a thing of the past. Alan and Jin have kind of living in marital bliss. As for Owen and Lakshmi, they might live in another world for all we know.

Someday it may change, but for now, female horn it is.
I think if you look at all other *popular* PG13 to R comics, you will find it is very much the norm...

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:59 am
by Swedish Chef
Nothing new here, after all the Internet is for horn.

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:46 am
by AnotherFairportfan
Swedish Chef wrote:Nothing new here, after all the Internet is for horn.
You die now.

Re: Cheeky 2016-11-22

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:21 am
by Just Old Al
AnotherFairportfan wrote:
Swedish Chef wrote:Nothing new here, after all the Internet is for horn.
You die now.
{hyperventilating}