Page 2 of 2
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 3:36 pm
by AnotherFairportfan
FreeFlier wrote:If memory serves, punt guns were usually about eight feet long, and didn't have actual shoulder stocks.
I want to build one someday.
--FreeFlier
Donald Hamilton's Western novel
The Two-Shoot Gun describes something that sounds a lot like a punt gun The gunsmith who owns it says he loads it with a dram of powder in each barrel, as i recall (been years since last i read it) - i forget what shot load he describes - then take it down to the local lake while migration is going on, fires both barrels and harvests enough waterfowl to meet his needs, plus a lot left over to sell to the local hotel dining room.
It's eventually used as a riot-control device...
{Great line from an Amazon review of the above: "Beware the man with only one gun. He probably knows how to use it."}
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:41 pm
by ShneekeyTheLost
I suspect that what actually happened was that the rounds went through the walls, and not the door.
here we see that the chair is actually perpendicular to the door. Which means, if the rounds DID come from that direction, they did so at a very acute or obtuse angle. This is reinforced in the next
strip where we don't see any bullet holes.
So, my theory is this: They're renting out the place, they didn't have time to tear out all the load-bearing walls and replace them with metal-reinforced, just install the panic-door (which is probably also attached to a screamer somewhere in MIB). The rounds in the chair came from very near the side wall, possibly from that corner, screaming in at a very obtuse angle. However, because of the funky angle, it's not going to look like a through-and-through unless you look at it at just the right angle, so looking right at the door, you see a metal door slammed shut, and some holes that don't have any light shining through them and don't look like they penetrated. So the OPFOR bugs, assuming the walls are also reinforced.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:59 pm
by Dave
ShneekeyTheLost wrote:So, my theory is this: They're renting out the place, they didn't have time to tear out all the load-bearing walls and replace them with metal-reinforced, just install the panic-door (which is probably also attached to a screamer somewhere in MIB). The rounds in the chair came from very near the side wall, possibly from that corner, screaming in at a very obtuse angle. However, because of the funky angle, it's not going to look like a through-and-through unless you look at it at just the right angle, so looking right at the door, you see a metal door slammed shut, and some holes that don't have any light shining through them and don't look like they penetrated.
"Yeah, we're not getting that damage deposit back."

Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:01 am
by FreeFlier
AnotherFairportfan wrote:FreeFlier wrote:If memory serves, punt guns were usually about eight feet long, and didn't have actual shoulder stocks.
I want to build one someday.
Donald Hamilton's Western novel
The Two-Shoot Gun describes something that sounds a lot like a punt gun The gunsmith who owns it says he loads it with a dram of powder in each barrel, as i recall (been years since last i read it) - i forget what shot load he describes - then take it down to the local lake while migration is going on, fires both barrels and harvests enough waterfowl to meet his needs, plus a lot left over to sell to the local hotel dining room. . . .
AFAIK
punt guns were usually single-barrel, though market gunners sometimes had more than one in a punt.
And he definitely used more than a dram of powder . . .
mild 2-3/4 inch target loads are 2-3/4 dram (equivalent).
Some of those
standardized gauges are scary . . . It's tempting to claim that the AA was so named because it was an Anti-Aircraft weapon!
--FreeFlier
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:32 am
by jwhouk
Hodgson's Law, people.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:59 am
by Alkarii
I don't know that reference.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 3:11 am
by GlytchMeister
Alkarii wrote:I don't know that reference.
Lmgtfy
Wow, that site has changed since I used it last. It's been a while since I had an opportunity to pull this one out on someone...

Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:53 am
by Alkarii
Yeah, I'd actually been avoiding Google lately, because any time I click a result, the page has trouble loading. This is probably due in part to my phone's internet speed being greatly reduced after using so much high speed data.
It also will do this very annoying thing where a page will have loaded completely, and then, moments AFTER it finishes loading it will be replaced with an error screen, saying "We're having trouble displaying this page right now.". As in, after it has already displayed the page.
I tried using Google to keep up with the election, but pages wouldn't load at all.
Edit: Yeah, it just sends me to TV Tropes, which I have only gotten to load on my phone maybe twice.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:01 am
by TazManiac
GlytchMeister wrote:Alkarii wrote:I don't know that reference.
Lmgtfy
Wow, that site has changed since I used it last. It's been a while since I had an opportunity to pull this one out on someone...

Good ol' Google-
http://www.hodgsonlawoffices.com/
What?

Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 1:31 pm
by GlytchMeister
Tv tropes calls it the MST3K mantra, which is "it's just a show, I should really just relax"
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 3:25 pm
by Alkarii
Yeah, it actually did load after a while, I just forgot to mention that. I've been a little busy today.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:25 pm
by TazManiac
Following up on the Depleted Uranium as firearm rounds, Wikipedia had a headline speaking on the naming of some Trans-Uranium Elements...
The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry announces official names for recently discovered superheavy elements nihonium (113), moscovium (115), tennessine (117), and oganesson (118).
Which led to...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihonium
Which led to...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactinide_element
Which led to...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_7_element
and led to... and led to...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:13 pm
by FreeFlier
jwhouk wrote:Hodgson's Law, people.
I don't know about the others, but I'm an engineer . . . this is how I enjoy myself.
--FreeFlier
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:22 am
by GlytchMeister
That's pretty much the start of the chain of thought Dave and I had when we were working on figuring out a workable system for the Vimana Cells. Haven't had an opportunity to mention it in the stories yet, but we spent more than a few days hammering it out. I'm quite proud of it.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:56 am
by jwhouk
Basically, an element that gets so heavy that it doesn't give off any radiation?
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:09 pm
by AnotherFairportfan
jwhouk wrote:Basically, an element that gets so heavy that it doesn't give off any radiation?
No; transuranics that have half-lives in days/months/years instead of microseconds.
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:52 pm
by Warrl
jwhouk wrote:Hodgson's Law, people.
I was going to equate that to the Hilbert Hotel, but unfortunately there does not seem to be a hotel by that name anywhere in reality. Not even in Hilbert, Wisconsin.
(Hilbert's Hotel does exist as a
thought experiment, and it's rather interesting... but as a review of a BBC TV show about it ends,
Warning: this film could make your brain hurt.)
Re: Little Voice 2016-11-08
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:56 pm
by AnotherFairportfan
Warrl wrote:jwhouk wrote:Hodgson's Law, people.
I was going to equate that to the Hilbert Hotel, but unfortunately there does not seem to be a hotel by that name anywhere in reality. Not even in Hilbert, Wisconsin.
(Hilbert's Hotel does exist as a
thought experiment, and it's rather interesting... but as a review of a BBC TV show about it ends,
Warning: this film could make your brain hurt.)
I thought that might be what that was.