elanora wrote:I understand this, and it makes a lot of sense, but this is the first time the bolded section has been contradicted. I'm queer, and a racial minority in real life, and that might be why this pricked a nerve with me. If LGBT people can live openly, so can wizards. But, if you want to be out of the closet... you have to come out of the closet. The general population being ignorant of magic confers a huge advantage to magic users, in that no one defends against or suspects magic when they don't believe it exists, and up until now I'd always assumed that the Masquerade was kept in place, at least secondarily, to preserve this advantage, and that the supernatural preferred the secrecy and exclusivity of the status quo.
And, I agree, that's probably one strong motivation for the Masquerade. I don't think there's only a single reason why the paranormals are choosing to stay hidden.
The atrocities you've listed are fine examples of human cruelty and intolerance, but they ring a bit hollow when you consider that The Holocaust would have been over before it started if the Jews had had even one Golem. In fact just someone with the *POIT* power, or even Tina alone would have been enough. Minority groups are able to be persecuted specifically because they are weaker than their oppressors.
Well, I sorta agree and sorta disagree. Things would definitely have been
different, but not necessarily
good.
What if the Jews had had a single golem, and the Nazis had also had a golem? (Analogy: the race between the Nazis and the Allies to develop an atomic bomb.) Likely the Holocaust wouldn't have happened as it did... but something much worse might have occurred. A golem-against-golem battle could have left the planet burned up worse than after the unfortunate Chimera incident.
In the current scenario: yes, a high-level paranormal such as a sphinx could defend lower-level paranormals against persecution to some extent. But, can we guarantee that all of the high-power paranormals would necessarily be on the same side, or be dedicated to defending all paranormals? We've seen that there are serious divisions among paranormals - there's a caste system of sorts (vampires and werewolves down at the bottom), and the sphinxes at least have an aggressive, violent, "I'm out for me, and the hell with you if you can't defend yourself!" culture. How likely is it that lower-caste paranormals would want to trust their lives to the sphinxes?
Also: it's convenient to think that strong paranormals could actually "protect" weaker ones against violence... but I don't believe that's true, any more than (e.g.) the presence of police can protect people against robbery or murder. In many cases, the best that a "protector" can do, is ensure that there are dire consequences and penalties for those who commit violence... they can't actually
stop the violence. There are plenty of people around who commit violence (out of racism, bigotry, anger, etc.) and who don't think through the possible consequences beforehand, or who simply don't care. We've had the death penalty for murder in many states for years... some states such as Texas even enforce it actively and fairly quickly... and as far as I can tell, there are still plenty of murders taking place in Texas (not to pick on them... it's a universal issue).
Sphinxes can easily kill humans (and they've done so for their own reasons for thousands of years)... but persuading humans to actually tolerate and befriend other paranormals so that violence doesn't happen, maybe not.
I'm reminded of the "Daughter of the Empire" trilogy, in which (spoiler)
the incredibly powerful Assembly of Magicians is forced in the end to admit that they can no longer maintain their covert control of culture in the Empire, because they aren't really suited to be active governors and persuaders, and because the only real response they could make to being widely defied is to commit mass slaughter. Power has its limits.
if the goal of many non-human supernaturals is to be able to stop hiding, and live happily and openly among humans... would they want to live in a world where they were feared and hated by humans, because of the very fact that they were "protected" by apex paranormals whose strategy is "slaughter any group of humans who hurt paranormals"? Would they achieve their real goal of happy coexistence that way?
There's another aspect of the "paranormals coming into open view" issue I thought of while riding into work this morning. If the truth about paranormals were disclosed, today's human culture would have to admit to the fact that the Old Gods are both real, and still alive... that Zeus, the Titans, Shiva, Amun, etc. aren't just myths. Possibly Yahway as well although he hasn't yet been mentioned in Wapsi as far as I can recall.
Just how would the mainstream religions (Abrahamic and otherwise) take this? Religious intolerance (up to and including religious wars) might become much worse than they are today. Greek and Hindu mythology are full of stories of conflicts between the gods, with the effects slopping over onto human society, and there's plenty of history of humans carrying out atrocities in the name of whatever they were worshiping. Adding proof that "Our God is real!" to this mix might be like throwing gasoline on a fire.
So, from where I sit, it feels as if the paranormal community as a whole sees that the benefits of Disclosure, are probably not worth the risks, and that Masquerade should be maintained.