Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

All off topic conversation held here. Have fun and play nice. =)

Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi

Post Reply
User avatar
AnotherFairportfan
Posts: 6402
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm

Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by AnotherFairportfan »

Image

The text of the motion.

{Apparently there actually IS a picture of a kitten in one of the exhibits referenced.)
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7586
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by Dave »

I think some lawyer(s) had a great amount of fun writing that.
User avatar
Sgt. Howard
Posts: 3332
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:54 pm
Location: Malott, Washington

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by Sgt. Howard »

April 1st isn't until Saturday, you know...
Rule 17 of the Bombay Golf Course- "You shall play the ball where the monkey drops it,"
I speak fluent Limrick-
the Old Sgt.
User avatar
AnotherFairportfan
Posts: 6402
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by AnotherFairportfan »

Sgt. Howard wrote:April 1st isn't until Saturday, you know...
It's real.
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
ShneekeyTheLost
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by ShneekeyTheLost »

So a conservative rag bashes a liberal rag, then when said liberal rag actually has the effrontery to sue over libel, they try to use some slick lawyer trick so they can use a buddy-buddy judge to get themselves off with a slap on the wrist.

The only part of this that I find amazing? That it is actually being taken to court. For which I strongly applaud. Too long, rags on both ends have stopped reporting news and have sunk to the levels of demagoguery. It's about time we brought some respectability back to the journalism industry.
User avatar
lake_wrangler
Posts: 4300
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Laval, Québec, Canada

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by lake_wrangler »

ShneekeyTheLost wrote:So a conservative rag bashes a liberal rag, then when said liberal rag actually has the effrontery to sue over libel, they try to use some slick lawyer trick so they can use a buddy-buddy judge to get themselves off with a slap on the wrist.

The only part of this that I find amazing? That it is actually being taken to court. For which I strongly applaud. Too long, rags on both ends have stopped reporting news and have sunk to the levels of demagoguery. It's about time we brought some respectability back to the journalism industry.
The cynical in me wants to ask if there ever was, respectability in journalism... :mrgreen:
User avatar
AmriloJim
Posts: 1190
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: 35ºN 101ºW (for the GPS-challenged, that's Amarillo TX)
Contact:

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by AmriloJim »

I recall working int the NBC4 Amarillo newsroom during the early hours of Desert Storm I. Brokaw was handed a bulletin about a breaking development. He immediately asked if the item had been confirmed... when the producer could not verify confirmation, Brokaw said he did not want to see that item again until it could be confirmed.

Boy, have things changed in the past 16 years.
User avatar
Sgt. Howard
Posts: 3332
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:54 pm
Location: Malott, Washington

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by Sgt. Howard »

lake_wrangler wrote:
ShneekeyTheLost wrote:So a conservative rag bashes a liberal rag, then when said liberal rag actually has the effrontery to sue over libel, they try to use some slick lawyer trick so they can use a buddy-buddy judge to get themselves off with a slap on the wrist.

The only part of this that I find amazing? That it is actually being taken to court. For which I strongly applaud. Too long, rags on both ends have stopped reporting news and have sunk to the levels of demagoguery. It's about time we brought some respectability back to the journalism industry.
The cynical in me wants to ask if there ever was, respectability in journalism... :mrgreen:

In January of 1898, two things of import happened in Cuba- the USS Main steamed into the harbor at Havana, and Fredrick Remington (the artist) and Steven Crane (the author) received a telegram from their boss, William Randolf Hearst in response to their letter complaining about heat, mosquitos and no popular rebellion against Spanish rule- the telegram read and I quote; " No, please stay stop you supply the story stop I'll supply the war stop"

... three weeks later, the Main went sky high- you may draw your own conclusions...
Rule 17 of the Bombay Golf Course- "You shall play the ball where the monkey drops it,"
I speak fluent Limrick-
the Old Sgt.
User avatar
Atomic
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:39 am
Location: Central PA
Contact:

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by Atomic »

Sgt. Howard wrote:... three weeks later, the Main went sky high- you may draw your own conclusions...
What's not commonly known is the Battleship Maine, sunk February 1898, was investigated in 1974 by none other than Adm Hiram Rickover (Retired). The two 1898 and 1911 inquiries were reviewed, and photos from the 1911-12 work to raise, refloat, and remove the wreck from the harbor were examined in light of modern investigative techniques. The original inquiries concluded an external mine did the deed, but Rickover noted the blast damage was from the inside out, and not the reverse. Moreover, the ship had been designed to use Anthracite (hard) coal, but had been stocked with cheaper and more common Bituminous (soft) coal. Soft coal burns hotter so ships can go faster, but it's more gassy in storage. The stink it puts off is called Firedamp, a mix of methane and other goodies that makes coal mines blow up. He concluded the poor (for soft coal) bunker ventilation and proximity to a powder magazine led to a bunker explosion causing a magazine explosion with destroyed the front end of the ship, sinking it.
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!

My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
User avatar
Catawampus
Posts: 2145
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:47 pm

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by Catawampus »

AmriloJim wrote:I recall working int the NBC4 Amarillo newsroom during the early hours of Desert Storm I. Brokaw was handed a bulletin about a breaking development. He immediately asked if the item had been confirmed... when the producer could not verify confirmation, Brokaw said he did not want to see that item again until it could be confirmed.

Boy, have things changed in the past 16 years.
It wasn't too long after that when I got to watch a world-famous news announcer (whom I shall not name) trying his hardest to cause a quarrel between the leaders of two opposing sides who were just wrapping up a long and shaky process of negotiating an end to a very unpleasant war. Apparently peace wasn't flashy enough for his reporting.
Atomic wrote:What's not commonly known is the Battleship Maine, sunk February 1898, was investigated in 1974 by none other than Adm Hiram Rickover (Retired). . . . He concluded the poor (for soft coal) bunker ventilation and proximity to a powder magazine led to a bunker explosion causing a magazine explosion with destroyed the front end of the ship, sinking it.
That isn't commonly known?
User avatar
lake_wrangler
Posts: 4300
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Laval, Québec, Canada

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by lake_wrangler »

Catawampus wrote:
Atomic wrote:What's not commonly known is the Battleship Maine, sunk February 1898, was investigated in 1974 by none other than Adm Hiram Rickover (Retired). . . . He concluded the poor (for soft coal) bunker ventilation and proximity to a powder magazine led to a bunker explosion causing a magazine explosion with destroyed the front end of the ship, sinking it.
That isn't commonly known?
Well, I certainly didn't know it...
User avatar
scantrontb
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:44 am

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by scantrontb »

lake_wrangler wrote:
Catawampus wrote:That isn't commonly known?
Well, I certainly didn't know it...
But you're an UNcommon person, so it's OK that you didn't know it. D:
Don't planto mihi adveho illac
User avatar
lake_wrangler
Posts: 4300
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Laval, Québec, Canada

Re: Title of motion to dismiss motion to dismiss lawsuit

Post by lake_wrangler »

scantrontb wrote:But you're an UNcommon person
Why, thank you, kind sir... :D
Post Reply