More Stuff

All off topic conversation held here. Have fun and play nice. =)

Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi

User avatar
GlytchMeister
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
Location: Central Illinois
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by GlytchMeister »

I’ve heard that the more recent generations are focusing less on internalizing knowledge itself but rather they are internalizing how to find the knowledge they need. So, proper use of search engines, proper research methods, how to spot bullshit, stuff like that.

Instead of memorizing all of the formulas and identities in a Trig or Calculus textbook, we are memorizing how to quickly find those formulas and identities online.

Which kinda explains how most every 12 year old “knows” how to fix grandpa’s computer, seemingly no matter what the problem is. They don’t. They just know how to diagnose the problem and look up and effective solution.
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
User avatar
Bookworm
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:59 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by Bookworm »

GlytchMeister wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:25 pm I’ve heard that the more recent generations are focusing less on internalizing knowledge itself but rather they are internalizing how to find the knowledge they need. So, proper use of search engines, proper research methods, how to spot bullshit, stuff like that.

Instead of memorizing all of the formulas and identities in a Trig or Calculus textbook, we are memorizing how to quickly find those formulas and identities online.

Which kinda explains how most every 12 year old “knows” how to fix grandpa’s computer, seemingly no matter what the problem is. They don’t. They just know how to diagnose the problem and look up and effective solution.
That's always been my skill set, even in university. I considered going into information retrieval, but couldn't find a good way to start off. Yes, I can repair an enormous amount of things, but I know _how_ to find the right information, and how to diagnose it.

Now, the difference between the mathematics example you gave and computers is that with a computer, there are an enormous number of variables in diagnostics and service. Just because it's an 0x0000000A error, which is IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL, doesn't mean you'll be able to find the right fix.

It could be memory, it could be a hardware driver that's bad, it could be a video card, it can be the processor, it can be Microsoft... -- you have to be able to drill down and test each one.

That's why I was pointing out questioning the methodology, not the answer. Heck, even if they memorize the methodology - they've just shown they know how to do it :)
I'll get a life when it's proven and substantiated to be better than what I'm currently experiencing.
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7584
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: More Stuff

Post by Dave »

Bookworm wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 pmThat's why I was pointing out questioning the methodology, not the answer. Heck, even if they memorize the methodology - they've just shown they know how to do it :)
No disagreement here! In the interviews I do, I try to set the problem up so that I can watch the candidate "walk through" the problem in the way to a solution... I try to study their thinking and problem-solving processes. Do they ask questions first to make sure that they understand what's being asked for? Do they talk through an overall solution (even if not in depth anywhere) before they "dive in" on the details of a small part of it? Do they discuss alternatives? Do they see and acknowledge the limitations of what they've done/written (that is, are they willing to admit mistakes) or do they try to bluff their way through? Are they willing to say "I don't know"?

Seniority and experience aren't everything... I've had a few very junior engineers do very well indeed, outclassing others with many years more experience. There were a couple where it was a real pleasure to write a "do hire, I like the way he/she thinks" recommendation.
Warrl
Posts: 1723
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:44 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by Warrl »

GlytchMeister wrote: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:25 pm I’ve heard that the more recent generations are focusing less on internalizing knowledge itself but rather they are internalizing how to find the knowledge they need. So, proper use of search engines, proper research methods, how to spot bullshit, stuff like that.

Instead of memorizing all of the formulas and identities in a Trig or Calculus textbook, we are memorizing how to quickly find those formulas and identities online.

Which kinda explains how most every 12 year old “knows” how to fix grandpa’s computer, seemingly no matter what the problem is. They don’t. They just know how to diagnose the problem and look up and effective solution.
Lots of fields also have specialized language. So it's sometimes a matter of knowing how to word the question.

A couple decades ago I concluded that an expert is a person who knows how to word the question and where to look up the answer. Search engines mostly eliminate the latter half of the problem - you still need to eliminate 5 irrelevant common meanings of your technical term plus three technical meanings from other, unrelated fields.
Alkarii
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:02 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by Alkarii »

Well... Dang it!

That new bolt carrier group I ordered came in, and it's really smooth, but the problem persists, so it's gotta be the bolt catch. Either they made it too thin, or the hole for the pin was drilled too large, or the slot for it in the receiver was cut too wide.

Given that I know that catch worked when I bought the rifle, my guess is that it somehow got a bit of wear around the pivot pin. If they fix the issue, and it comes back, I'm gonna have to see about getting a galvanized catch. Though a shim might fix the issue, too.
There is no such thing as a science experiment gone wrong.
User avatar
GlytchMeister
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
Location: Central Illinois
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by GlytchMeister »

This sounds like a whole lot of too-coarse tolerances. One would think random spot checks would catch this sort of thing and alert the engineers.
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7584
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: More Stuff

Post by Dave »

GlytchMeister wrote: Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:56 pm This sounds like a whole lot of too-coarse tolerances. One would think random spot checks would catch this sort of thing and alert the engineers.
That is, sometimes, the difference between the "bargain" brands, and the "high-priced spread"... tolerances, and quality control.

Some manufacturers check every single piece for tolerances. Others just do statistical spot-checks. In the case of the latter, an occasional out-of-tolerance one gets out and is sold, because it didn't happen to be one of the ones that was actually tested.
Alkarii
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:02 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by Alkarii »

Well, I found out what the problem was with my rifle.

A few weeks ago, I removed the buffers for both rifles for a comparison, to see if a commercial stock would fit my AR-10 (the AR-15 build is mil spec, however; I was seeing if there was a significant difference between the two). Someone had called me for something, and when I got back to my room, I looked at the two parts and thought "oh, this one is longer, and therefore heavier, it must be for the AR-10."

Then, while looking around for bolt catches, to see if they're supposed to be beveled on the top or not, I stumbled across a gun forum post that was three years old, and someone was having a similar issue.

It turns out, the catch on an AR-10 is supposed to catch the BOLT, not the bolt carrier, and is supposed to be across a couple of the lugs. And that wasn't happening here. Someone had also said to check the buffer, because an AR-10 buffer is actually shorter than an AR-15's buffer, to accommodate the longer bolt carrier.

So, I had actually switched my buffers by mistake, and when I switched them back, I saw the face of the longer buffer had scratches, which I remembered had happened before I ever got the AR-10 home.

And now, everything is fine, and I don't have to actually send my rifle anywhere.
There is no such thing as a science experiment gone wrong.
User avatar
Atomic
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:39 am
Location: Central PA
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by Atomic »

Congrats!

And now you will remember to segregate parts from different projects. Wax on, wax off...
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!

My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
User avatar
Just Old Al
Posts: 1684
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 am
Location: Wilderness of Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by Just Old Al »

Atomic wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:15 pm Congrats!

And now you will remember to segregate parts from different projects. Wax on, wax off...
A pile for everything and everything all over the place...never a good sorting method.
"The Empire was founded on cups of tea, mate, and if you think I am going to war without one you are sadly mistaken."
User avatar
GlytchMeister
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
Location: Central Illinois
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by GlytchMeister »

Just Old Al wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:50 pm
Atomic wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:15 pm Congrats!

And now you will remember to segregate parts from different projects. Wax on, wax off...
A pile for everything and everything all over the place...never a good sorting method.
Indignant Sarge in three... two... one... :P
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
User avatar
Bookworm
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 11:59 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by Bookworm »

GlytchMeister wrote: Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:04 am
Just Old Al wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:50 pm
Atomic wrote: Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:15 pm Congrats!

And now you will remember to segregate parts from different projects. Wax on, wax off...
A pile for everything and everything all over the place...never a good sorting method.
Indignant Sarge in three... two... one... :P
So, you need Maalox, or just a cardboard box to live in?
I'll get a life when it's proven and substantiated to be better than what I'm currently experiencing.
User avatar
Atomic
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:39 am
Location: Central PA
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by Atomic »

And THIS is what happens when you do things One Piece at a Time!
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!

My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
Alkarii
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:02 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by Alkarii »

Well, I just ordered a reloading press kit. It was on sale, so I get a whole bunch of stuff for $150 or so. Though, I'm likely going to get a digital powder scale and calipers, to make things easier, and I intend to get a reloading manual, and apparently logbooks are available, so maybe they're somewhat necessary.
There is no such thing as a science experiment gone wrong.
User avatar
AnotherFairportfan
Posts: 6402
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 2:53 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by AnotherFairportfan »

Alkarii wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:23 am ...apparently logbooks are available, so maybe they're somewhat necessary.
Well, yeah. That way, the investigators and your heirs know how hot a load was TOO hot.
Proof Positive the world is not flat: If it were, cats would have pushed everything off the edge by now.
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7584
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: More Stuff

Post by Dave »

AnotherFairportfan wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 2:55 pm
Alkarii wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:23 am ...apparently logbooks are available, so maybe they're somewhat necessary.
Well, yeah. That way, the investigators and your heirs know how hot a load was TOO hot.
And, short of that, a logbook (or other fairly-detailed record keeping) is the only good way to experiment, and then be able to track the results and correlate them to the changes you made. If (e.g.) you try three or four different brands or types of smokeless powder, and a couple of different quantities of powder per cartridge, and then fire off a half-box or so of each combination on the range in each of a couple of rifles... you're going to want to have good records so that you can make any sort of sense of the results. Trusting your own memory to keep track of all of the details isn't a good idea.

The "how hot was TOO hot?" investigation does depend on your remembering to keep the logbooks safely outside of the worst-possible blast radius at all times. 8-)
Alkarii
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:02 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by Alkarii »

That all did come to mind, but I'm not so sure I'm gonna notice much difference beyond recoil. I don't really have anywhere I can safely shoot that has a clear line of sight long enough to see any difference in accuracy (even 100 yards is difficult to find, with all the trees and hills), and I don't currently have a rifle designed for precision. My brother has an AR-10 build he's got on hold at the moment that's being built for it, and I intend to do something similar myself.

Mostly, it's gonna save me money on ammo in the long run, as I intend to stockpile at least a thousand rounds for each rifle, though I can't reuse anything fired by the C308, thanks to the fluted chamber, so I'll just use 7.62 NATO for that. (Apparently the brass itself is different.)
There is no such thing as a science experiment gone wrong.
User avatar
Atomic
Posts: 2948
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:39 am
Location: Central PA
Contact:

Re: More Stuff

Post by Atomic »

I am reminded of a loader/shooter who told me of his misadventures of trying to make an ultimate varmint load for his .222 rifle. It seems for all the noise and recoil, he just couldn't hit anything at 100 yards to scope in. Then he realized that white streak enroute to the target was the bullet evaporating.

Duh.
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!

My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
User avatar
Dave
Posts: 7584
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Mountain View, CA, USA

Re: More Stuff

Post by Dave »

Alkarii wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:57 pm Mostly, it's gonna save me money on ammo in the long run, as I intend to stockpile at least a thousand rounds for each rifle, though I can't reuse anything fired by the C308, thanks to the fluted chamber, so I'll just use 7.62 NATO for that. (Apparently the brass itself is different.)
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/201 ... -chambers/ is a pretty scary write-up about the incompatibility between G3 fluted chambers and commercial .308 ammo.

I don't know whether your C308 was built with a true G3-spec chamber, or one which is compatible with .308 ammo. Sticking with the 7.62 ammo for which the rifle was built, seems like a good safety decision.
Alkarii
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:02 pm

Re: More Stuff

Post by Alkarii »

Well, it is marked for .308, but I was planning on using NATO surplus ammo for it. NATO brass is a tiny bit different, or so I hear, and I'd rather keep the .308 brass for the other two .308 rifles.
There is no such thing as a science experiment gone wrong.
Post Reply