Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Bathorys Daughter · Post by **Bathorys Daughter** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:07 pm

NOTDilbert wrote:Could be - although on a 'gals only' beach she could have just gone neckers - as could they all - unless that's not a 100% guaranteed uninhabited island?

I don't know about anyone else, but I would not just go naked even if only other females were around. I would be just as em-bare-assed to get naked in front of them as I would in mixed company.

Fairportfan · Post by **Fairportfan** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:48 pm

NOTDilbert wrote:
Julie wrote:
NOTDilbert wrote:Uh....

just noticed....

Shelly's wearing a different swimsuit than in the pinup page. This one has straps.

(No, I am NOT the fashion police. Look at my gravatar, for pity's sake...)
Gah! You're right! Maybe she was doing the thing that some ladies do when tanning by pulling the straps down and tucking them away to not have those tan lines??
Could be - although on a 'gals only' beach she could have just gone neckers - as could they all - unless that's not a 100% guaranteed uninhabited island?

Hay - e're watching, aren't we?

NOTDilbert · Post by **NOTDilbert** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:08 pm

Fairportfan wrote: Hay - we're watching, aren't we?

Yup yup. That's why we still got the YA rating, so the trans-dimensional periscope Paul uses will only get swimsuits, no neckered girls. (c8

Jabberwonky · Post by **Jabberwonky** » Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:41 pm

NOTDilbert wrote:
Fairportfan wrote: Hay - we're watching, aren't we?
Yup yup. That's why we still got the YA rating, so the trans-dimensional periscope Paul uses will only get swimsuits, no neckered girls. (c8

But Brandi....http://wapsisquare.com/comic/kind-of-damage/

NOTDilbert · Post by **NOTDilbert** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:12 am

Jabberwonky wrote:
NOTDilbert wrote:
Fairportfan wrote: Hay - we're watching, aren't we?
Yup yup. That's why we still got the YA rating, so the trans-dimensional periscope Paul uses will only get swimsuits, no neckered girls. (c8
But Brandi....http://wapsisquare.com/comic/kind-of-damage/

Well, YEAH - He doesn't GO there, he just looks and Draws.....sheesh, gotta 'splain the technolumgey stuff over and over... (c8|

davids4250 · Post by **davids4250** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:46 am

NOTDilbert wrote: Could be - although on a 'gals only' beach she could have just gone neckers - as could they all - unless that's not a 100% guaranteed uninhabited island?

For that matter, Nudge usually runs around in just her fur, but on this "deserted" beach she has a bikini. She looks very fetching, too.

Jabberwonky · Post by **Jabberwonky** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:42 am

davids4250 wrote:
NOTDilbert wrote: Could be - although on a 'gals only' beach she could have just gone neckers - as could they all - unless that's not a 100% guaranteed uninhabited island?
For that matter, Nudge usually runs around in just her fur, but on this "deserted" beach she has a bikini. She looks very fetching, too.

I don't see a stick in her mouth...

(drops wooden nickels in the pun jar)

Julie · Post by **Julie** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:37 am

Bathorys Daughter wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but I would not just go naked even if only other females were around. I would be just as em-bare-assed to get naked in front of them as I would in mixed company.

Me too...I've been okay in locker rooms before, but even then it's a little uncomfortable. In the open? Definitely going to wear a suit.

Maybe it's because women are so stinking self-conscious about their appearance...or comparing themselves to someone else...maybe that explains my discomfort. *shrugs*

bmonk · Post by **bmonk** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:47 am

Julie wrote:
Bathorys Daughter wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but I would not just go naked even if only other females were around. I would be just as em-bare-assed to get naked in front of them as I would in mixed company.
Me too...I've been okay in locker rooms before, but even then it's a little uncomfortable. In the open? Definitely going to wear a suit.

Maybe it's because women are so stinking self-conscious about their appearance...or comparing themselves to someone else...maybe that explains my discomfort. *shrugs*

I think women are more conditioned to care about how they look--and even minimum clothing can do lots to help a person look good. It takes a fantastic body to look good nude. Which is one reason to turn the lights down when getting "romantic" . . .

Bathorys Daughter · Post by **Bathorys Daughter** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:09 pm

bmonk wrote:I think women are more conditioned to care about how they look--and even minimum clothing can do lots to help a person look good. It takes a fantastic body to look good nude. Which is one reason to turn the lights down when getting "romantic" . . .

And that is extremely rare. Everyone's bodies have some sort of "problems" and blemishes. I've seen pictures of some of those great looking models naked and they looked really bad. Most were way too thin for their body type. Not really appealing once you get a good look. Of course there are women who have no problem with showing every square inch (close up), but most of us aren't like that. Not only for looks but for moral reasons as well.

Fairportfan · Post by **Fairportfan** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:20 pm

bmonk wrote:I think women are more conditioned to care about how they look--and even minimum clothing can do lots to help a person look good. It takes a fantastic body to look good nude. Which is one reason to turn the lights down when getting "romantic" . . .

When I turn off the living room light...

illiad · Post by **illiad** » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:24 pm

bmonk wrote:I think women are more conditioned to care about how they look--and even minimum clothing can do lots to help a person look good. It takes a fantastic body to look good nude. Which is one reason to turn the lights down when getting "romantic" . . .

well you haven't been to Rio, Mexico, or Mediterranean Europe... I find most women from those places have no problems!!

Julie · Post by **Julie** » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:24 am

illiad wrote:
bmonk wrote:I think women are more conditioned to care about how they look--and even minimum clothing can do lots to help a person look good. It takes a fantastic body to look good nude. Which is one reason to turn the lights down when getting "romantic" . . .
well you haven't been to Rio, Mexico, or Mediterranean Europe... I find most women from those places have no problems!!

They've had different cultural conditioning than American women.

I'm a tad jealous.

Jabberwonky · Post by **Jabberwonky** » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:29 am

Julie wrote:
illiad wrote:
bmonk wrote:I think women are more conditioned to care about how they look--and even minimum clothing can do lots to help a person look good. It takes a fantastic body to look good nude. Which is one reason to turn the lights down when getting "romantic" . . .
well you haven't been to Rio, Mexico, or Mediterranean Europe... I find most women from those places have no problems!!
They've had different cultural conditioning than American women. I'm a tad jealous.

It's not all good, imagine a 60 yo German grandmother topless on the beaches of Tailand....

Julie · Post by **Julie** » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:37 am

Jabberwonky wrote:It's not all good, imagine a 60 yo German grandmother topless on the beaches of Tailand....

Not all good for the people wanting to enjoy a bit of voyeuristic ogling maybe.

It's very good for the self-esteems of those ladies who have learned to not care what people think and/or be proud of their bodies, however they've been formed.

Wapsi Square Forum

Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23

Re: Like A Sad Sack 2012-08-23