As I recall "eye of newt" was some kind of berry, similar to "wing of bat" actually being holly leaves. Looking up the modern definition in http://witcheslore.com/bookofshadows/he ... ic-2/1174/ we find the correlation to be mustard seed, other sources cite it as a species of marshberry http://witchesofthecraft.com/2013/06/20 ... ly-an-eye/shadowinthelight wrote:Sounds like something that should be accompanied by eye of newt.Dave wrote:leg of tarantula
Free After Work 2014-01-17
Moderators: Bookworm, starkruzr, MrFireDragon, PrettyPrincess, Wapsi
Forum rules
When two threads are posted for a day's comic, the thread posted first becomes the starting post. Please delete the second thread and add your post to the first thread. When naming the thread: Comic Name YYYY-MM-DD
Thanks guys! This keeps the forum nice and neat.
When two threads are posted for a day's comic, the thread posted first becomes the starting post. Please delete the second thread and add your post to the first thread. When naming the thread: Comic Name YYYY-MM-DD
Thanks guys! This keeps the forum nice and neat.
- Opus the Poet
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:24 am
- Location: Surrounded by Hell
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
I ride my bike to ride my bike, and sometimes it takes me where I need to go.
- NOTDilbert
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:39 am
- Location: Western Arkansas, USA
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Don't they tend to fall through the grill onto the charcoal?Aleister Crow wrote:That's what I was thinking. Just way too frazzled to focus.TazManiac wrote:In a follow up to my previous post, here is a 1st meeting between Phix 'big-sphynx-all-mighTee' and Tina-ski;
http://wapsisquare.com/comics/2010-06-17-now-focus.gif
In it, as Phix is leaving, she asks whether Tina was going to predict her order but Tina is "having trouble concentrating...".
Based on the context of the prev day's comix, It's a safe bet they hadn't yet met, not to Tina's knowledge anyway...
I'm partial to Barbecued, myself.Dave wrote:Uggh. Mealworm tea That's a disgusting idea, dude. Nobody makes tea out of mealworms.NOTDilbert wrote:Unless Atsali is into mealworm tea for breakfast, why can't Tina read her? Can't be cause she's a paranormal, she can read Phix.....
They're much tastier deep-fried or toasted, with a bit of garlic salt.
"Imagination is more important than Knowledge" - Albert Einstein
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it DOES rhyme" - Mark Twain
"Always. Expect. Ninjas." - Syndey Scoville
"History doesn't repeat itself, but it DOES rhyme" - Mark Twain
"Always. Expect. Ninjas." - Syndey Scoville
- Jabberwonky
- Posts: 2963
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:11 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
In Thailand 'bug carts' were not common, but not that hard to find either. I noticed that most European and American tourists just paid a small fee to take a picture along side the cart. Personally, having ridden motorcycles most of my life, eating a bug isn't that big a squick. But, and I have stated this before, if the bug is big enough to need a second bite, I'm not going back in for it...Nice to have a choice of flavors there. Pricey, though, compared to what you'd pay in Southern American countries where they're a popular snack.
Must admit, I have never actually tried them myself. However, my wife and I recently vacationed in Southeast Asia, and in Laos were offered a popular beer-snack... fried crickets and grasshoppers. I found them to be quite tasty... a cross between fried shrimp and Frito's corn chips.
A few days later I tried a local Cambodian delicacy... quick-fried tarantula... quite similar in flavor. On the basis of taste alone I would guess that more Americans than not would enjoy eating such arthropods properly prepared and seasoned.
Esthetically, though. . well, leg of tarantula is definitely and literally the creepiest thing I have ever eaten.
I also recall a man on an episode of Coast to Coast AM that visited Peru in search of ayahuasca he ate roasted Goliath tarantulas with the shamen. He claimed it tasted like crab.
"The price of perfection is prohibitive." - Anonymous
- Catawampus
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:47 pm
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Well, she'd need to have some method of distinguishing differences between the colours of objects. Otherwise she wouldn't be able to read signs or use a computer or a lot of other basic things that go on in everyday life. I expect that she would see different eye colours as being different, but probably in a much different way than we would.Timotheus wrote:And based on the earlier scenes in this story arc, are we sure Tina can even "see" those "black eyes" as described? Maybe she identifies everyone and their surroundings by their personal auras and magnetic/heat signatures and everything else is just "implied".
Of course, that brings up the old philosophical question of whether any two people actually perceive the world around them in the same way, and how would we really be able to tell whether or not they did. . .
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
in reality, most perception actually occurs in the brain... there is a LOT of research into how the eye works, I will leave you to google it!!Catawampus wrote:Well, she'd need to have some method of distinguishing differences between the colours of objects. Otherwise she wouldn't be able to read signs or use a computer or a lot of other basic things that go on in everyday life. I expect that she would see different eye colours as being different, but probably in a much different way than we would.Timotheus wrote:And based on the earlier scenes in this story arc, are we sure Tina can even "see" those "black eyes" as described? Maybe she identifies everyone and their surroundings by their personal auras and magnetic/heat signatures and everything else is just "implied".
Of course, that brings up the old philosophical question of whether any two people actually perceive the world around them in the same way, and how would we really be able to tell whether or not they did. . .
there was a recent experiment with prismatic glasses, that turned what the wearer saw *upside down* - after only a day or so of disorientation, he felt perfectly normal!!
two weeks later, they took off the glasses, and it took two days to recover, due to the disorientation!!! It shows how fast the brain adapts to the input...
this could be how tina 'sees' but with much finer quality... there are advanced IR cameras, that can see though masks and glasses...
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Chicken wire grill covers are a big help with that. (I know lots of survivalists)NOTDilbert wrote: Don't they tend to fall through the grill onto the charcoal?
This message is brought to you by the "Let the artist know how much you LOVE his work" council.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:31 am
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
But it clearly is a stretch to see Atsali wearing one.Skruddgemire wrote:They sell those T's at my local Hot Topic so it wouldn't be a stretch to see it at the mall where she and Castella went shopping.
(prepares to fire an elastic band into the pun jar from across the room).
Last edited by Prester Fred on Thu Jan 23, 2014 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Catawampus
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:47 pm
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
I was referring more to the part that comes after perception. The part that comes after the light enters the eye, hits the relevant nerves, the nerves signal to the brain, and the brain says, "Ah ha, the colour red has just been detected!". Once you've reached that point, your brain projects an internal image into your consciousness portraying what it thinks the colour red ought to look like.illiad wrote:in reality, most perception actually occurs in the brain... there is a LOT of research into how the eye works, I will leave you to google it!!
there was a recent experiment with prismatic glasses, that turned what the wearer saw *upside down* - after only a day or so of disorientation, he felt perfectly normal!!
The colour that you see within your mind, though, is not really what is on that red apple or whatever it is that you're looking at. It's your mind's own independent construct and interpretation.
Is there any particular reason why your internal view of the world has to have that particular image associated with 660 nm wavelengths of light, though? Your brain could just as easily have decided that what you currently perceive as blue is what the 660 nm wavelength appears as. You'd go through life quite happily calling that colour red, and you'd never know any different. And for all that you know, everybody else's brains could be assigning different colours to different wavelengths; what your brain presents red as being, somebody else's brain could be presenting as being the colour green. You'd both look at the red apple and agree that it is red, but the images in your minds would be different.
And why stop there? Perhaps what you perceive as being the colour of 660 nm, somebody else perceives as being the smell of burning lobsters.
Since we can never experience anything beyond our own individual brain's perceptions of the world around us, how can we tell?
- GlytchMeister
- Posts: 3733
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
- Location: Central Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Vsauce did a video on this exact question.Catawampus wrote:I was referring more to the part that comes after perception. The part that comes after the light enters the eye, hits the relevant nerves, the nerves signal to the brain, and the brain says, "Ah ha, the colour red has just been detected!". Once you've reached that point, your brain projects an internal image into your consciousness portraying what it thinks the colour red ought to look like.illiad wrote:in reality, most perception actually occurs in the brain... there is a LOT of research into how the eye works, I will leave you to google it!!
there was a recent experiment with prismatic glasses, that turned what the wearer saw *upside down* - after only a day or so of disorientation, he felt perfectly normal!!
The colour that you see within your mind, though, is not really what is on that red apple or whatever it is that you're looking at. It's your mind's own independent construct and interpretation.
Is there any particular reason why your internal view of the world has to have that particular image associated with 660 nm wavelengths of light, though? Your brain could just as easily have decided that what you currently perceive as blue is what the 660 nm wavelength appears as. You'd go through life quite happily calling that colour red, and you'd never know any different. And for all that you know, everybody else's brains could be assigning different colours to different wavelengths; what your brain presents red as being, somebody else's brain could be presenting as being the colour green. You'd both look at the red apple and agree that it is red, but the images in your minds would be different.
And why stop there? Perhaps what you perceive as being the colour of 660 nm, somebody else perceives as being the smell of burning lobsters.
Since we can never experience anything beyond our own individual brain's perceptions of the world around us, how can we tell?
If I were to try to answer it, I'd suggest downloading the schematics of several thousand brains (detailed enough to distinguish individual neurons) and then map out which neurons fire when light of "x" nm wavelengths are detected by the eye for each brain while that person is in a full-on sensory deprivation chamber. If the overall pattern of activation matches between people, then yes, my red is the same as your red.
This would take a lot of computer power. Like... A friggin' lot. Our brains are so complex they confuse themselves. We'd have to commandeer all of the hard drives just to store the brain schematics, if we did enough brains to create data of any real value.
Think about it. All of the hard drives.
...then again, I'm a mechanical engineering student, not a neurologist. *insert damnit, Jim/Jin joke here*
(I wonder why we always default to red. Why not indigo?)
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
- shadowinthelight
- Posts: 2571
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere, TX
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
If your lobsters are burning I think the light is too bright.Catawampus wrote:And why stop there? Perhaps what you perceive as being the colour of 660 nm, somebody else perceives as being the smell of burning lobsters.
Julie, about Wapsi Square wrote:Oh goodness yes. So much paranormal!
My deviantART and YouTube.
I'm done thinking for today! It's caused me enough trouble!
- GlytchMeister
- Posts: 3733
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
- Location: Central Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
If the light is making the lobsters burn, I think it may be time to lay off the acid.shadowinthelight wrote:If your lobsters are burning I think the light is too bright.Catawampus wrote:And why stop there? Perhaps what you perceive as being the colour of 660 nm, somebody else perceives as being the smell of burning lobsters.
On a somewhat related note, was that pony always in your avatar?
(Only on the Internet can those two sentences make any sense)
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
- shadowinthelight
- Posts: 2571
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere, TX
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Yes, since November 2012. I've kept the same avatar for that long?GlytchMeister wrote:On a somewhat related note, was that pony always in your avatar?
Julie, about Wapsi Square wrote:Oh goodness yes. So much paranormal!
My deviantART and YouTube.
I'm done thinking for today! It's caused me enough trouble!
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
so you have never used *sunlight* and a lens to make paper burn???GlytchMeister wrote:If the light is making the lobsters burn, I think it may be time to lay off the acid.shadowinthelight wrote:If your lobsters are burning I think the light is too bright.Catawampus wrote:And why stop there? Perhaps what you perceive as being the colour of 660 nm, somebody else perceives as being the smell of burning lobsters.
- GlytchMeister
- Posts: 3733
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
- Location: Central Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
*evil laugh*
Ohhh, I was just talking about ambient light.
Yes, I know how to focus sunlight. But it's just so boring after a while. I prefer chemicals... Like aerosols, liquid fuels, that sort of thing. I've made flame throwers, potato guns, sticky fire bombs, incendiary trees...
Next on my pyromaniac's list of things to play with are gunpowder and thermite.
Ohhh, I was just talking about ambient light.
Yes, I know how to focus sunlight. But it's just so boring after a while. I prefer chemicals... Like aerosols, liquid fuels, that sort of thing. I've made flame throwers, potato guns, sticky fire bombs, incendiary trees...
Next on my pyromaniac's list of things to play with are gunpowder and thermite.
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Speaking of Color Vision, there are plenty of tools out there to help "see" the effects, such as This color blindness simulator.
Of note is the idea that many animals are color blind, such as dogs. AFAIK, it's not that they see only grayscale, it's that they don't see Red - their eyes have only Blue and Green detection. Thus the spectra for Red deficient vision would represent what dogs might see.
Then again, insects such as Bees see far into the ultraviolet part of the spectrum, and pit vipers far into the infrared (thermal), so there's plenty of different ways of seeing stuff.
Tina's demons might be "seeing" our emotions directly, hence, the aura! Similar to Schlieren photography, perhaps?
Of note is the idea that many animals are color blind, such as dogs. AFAIK, it's not that they see only grayscale, it's that they don't see Red - their eyes have only Blue and Green detection. Thus the spectra for Red deficient vision would represent what dogs might see.
Then again, insects such as Bees see far into the ultraviolet part of the spectrum, and pit vipers far into the infrared (thermal), so there's plenty of different ways of seeing stuff.
Tina's demons might be "seeing" our emotions directly, hence, the aura! Similar to Schlieren photography, perhaps?
Don't let other peoples limitations become your constraints!
My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
My Deviant Art scribbles
The Atomic Guide to Basic GIMP Stuff
- GlytchMeister
- Posts: 3733
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:52 pm
- Location: Central Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
Or perhaps long-range EEG O' Vision? But that couldn't account for how she can pick up things like Georgette's painful history. That's way beyond the capabilities of EEG, as far as I know.Atomic wrote:Speaking of Color Vision, there are plenty of tools out there to help "see" the effects, such as This color blindness simulator.
Of note is the idea that many animals are color blind, such as dogs. AFAIK, it's not that they see only grayscale, it's that they don't see Red - their eyes have only Blue and Green detection. Thus the spectra for Red deficient vision would represent what dogs might see.
Then again, insects such as Bees see far into the ultraviolet part of the spectrum, and pit vipers far into the infrared (thermal), so there's plenty of different ways of seeing stuff.
Tina's demons might be "seeing" our emotions directly, hence, the aura! Similar to Schlieren photography, perhaps?
Ugh. I need to catch up on neuroscience and medicine...
He's mister GlytchMeister, he's mister code
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
He's mister exploiter, he's mister ones and zeros
They call me GlytchMeister, whatever I touch
Starts to glitch in my clutch!
I'm too much!
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
standard telepathic empathy could pick up on her 'history' though..
Re: Free After Work 2014-01-17
GlytchMeister wrote:Or perhaps long-range EEG O' Vision? But that couldn't account for how she can pick up things like Georgette's painful history. That's way beyond the capabilities of EEG, as far as I know.Atomic wrote:Speaking of Color Vision, there are plenty of tools out there to help "see" the effects, such as This color blindness simulator.
Of note is the idea that many animals are color blind, such as dogs. AFAIK, it's not that they see only grayscale, it's that they don't see Red - their eyes have only Blue and Green detection. Thus the spectra for Red deficient vision would represent what dogs might see.
Then again, insects such as Bees see far into the ultraviolet part of the spectrum, and pit vipers far into the infrared (thermal), so there's plenty of different ways of seeing stuff.
Tina's demons might be "seeing" our emotions directly, hence, the aura! Similar to Schlieren photography, perhaps?
Ugh. I need to catch up on neuroscience and medicine...
Georgette's demons? Could Tina's demons have spoke/questioned/exchanged details with Georgette's demons the moment she walked in the door?But that couldn't account for how she can pick up things like Georgette's painful history.
Which might go some way to explaining Tina's ability to read what drink people want? (ask their demons)
Which doesn't exactly explain how she was able to 'read' what to give Phix.
Maybe, while Sphinx don't have 'human demons', they do that their own demon like analogues (?), so that when Tina first meets Phix, with a bit of concentration and effort, Tina was able to get a bit of information to suggest a drink.
ie: wE dO nOt UnDeStAnD yOr QuEsTiOn, BuT oUr HoSt ReAlY lIkEs A pErSoN nAmEd "Picard"
= http://wapsisquare.com/comic/now-focus/
As a CareBearAnarchist I believe in the destruction and overthrow of the perils of society through random and senseless acts of consideration and kindness
Growing older is compulsory, growing up is optional
Dumb things happen to smart phones
Growing older is compulsory, growing up is optional
Dumb things happen to smart phones